The holidays and the tsunami in South Asia pushed 2004 MN4 out of the news, and in the meantime additional observations showed that the asteroid would miss, but only by 15,000 to 25,000 miles -- about one-tenth the distance to the moon. Asteroid 2004 MN4 was no false alarm. Instead, it has provided the world with the best evidence yet that a catastrophic encounter with a rogue visitor from space is not only possible but probably inevitable.
It also demonstrated the tenacity of the small band of professionals and amateurs who track potential impact asteroids, and highlighted the shortcomings of an international system that pays scant attention to their work.
"I used to say the total number of people interested in this was no more than one shift at a McDonald's restaurant," said David Morrison, an astronomer at NASA's Ames Research Center and a student of near-Earth objects for nearly three decades. "Now it's maybe two shifts." Awareness of the apocalyptic potential of near-Earth objects has been slow to develop. It took years for Nobel laureate Luis Alvarez and his son Walter to win acceptance for their 1980 research showing that a near-Earth object impact quite likely caused the extinction of the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.
"The human brain wouldn't grasp reality until it had somewhat more direct evidence," said Colorado-based planetary scientist Clark R. Chapman of the Southwest Research Institute, another longtime expert on near-Earth objects. "Alvarez provided that."
The vast majority of near-Earth objects are asteroids -- huge rocks or chunks of iron that travel around the sun in eccentric orbits that cross Earth's path periodically. The rest are comets -- ancient piles of dust, stones and ice that come in from the edges of the solar system.
"The good news is that comets represent 1 percent of the danger," said Donald K. Yeomans, who manages NASA's Near-Earth Object Program at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "The bad news is that should we find one, there's not a lot we can do about it. . . . We detect them only nine months from impact." Asteroids, by contrast, generally offer decades or even centuries of warning -- unless they are too small to detect, in which case there is no warning at all. But today's technology enables astronomers to get a fix on any asteroid capable of causing a global "extinction event" -- six miles in diameter or bigger.
Asteroid 2004 MN4 is a "regional" hazard -- big enough to flatten Texas or a couple of European countries with an impact equivalent to 10,000 megatons of dynamite -- more than all the nuclear weapons in the world. Even though it will be a near miss in 2029, that will not be the last word.
"You don't know what the gravitational effect of the Earth will be," said Brian G. Marsden, who oversees the hunt for near-Earth objects as director of the Minor Planet Center at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
"In 2029, the [close encounter with] Earth will increase the size of the orbit, and the object could get into a resonance with the Earth," he added. "You could get orbit matchups every five years or nine years, or something in between." In fact, 2004 MN4 could come close again in 2034, 2035, 2036, 2037, 2038 or later.
What many don't know is that this asteroid will come within 15,000 miles from earth or about 1/3rd the distance from here to the moon. And also, this asteroid was discovered in one of the orbital belt where the sun's glare hid the asteroid's presence.
Tholen, of the University of Hawaii, is a frequent contributor in the search for threatening objects. He specializes in "Atens," a subspecies that orbit mostly between the Earth and the sun and are difficult to see in the glare of the sun. To spot Atens, astronomers must work at dawn or dusk.
Tholen's team, on a field trip to the University of Arizona's Steward Observatory, had booked an hour on the evenings of June 19, 20, 23 and 24, 2004. They found a new Aten on the first evening and saw it again on the second evening. It was about 106 million miles away.
So, if you thought killer tsunami waves or the prospect of a supervolcano alarming, then an asteroid slamming into earth would make those disasters pale in comparison. What this article tells us is that there could be more asteroids out there than we care to think giving rise to the potential and increasing danger of an actual asteroid impact because the detection of one may go unnoticed long enough before its too late to do anything about it should there be a very small one versus a larger object that would be more likely to get picked up.
7 comments:
Like I said, if you cannot follow the rules of MY blog, ta ta. Otherwise, you can have a good discussion. It's not a hard concept, really.
If you want to hurl vindictive comments at me, it doesn't help the discussion at all.
I did not use any foul language. You cannot avoid the TRUTH!
Discussion?? Where, where?? I don't see any discussion!
Nice try but vindictiveness in comments are not conducive to a discussion. That's why yours were deleted in the first place. Anonymity is your middle name or what?
Direct that comment toward me or my family deserves deletion.
And yet you want to maintain your anonymity shows cowardice and any common sense of decency to face me like a man. Er maybe a woman.
You should read this one.. it's not going to happen.
"The highest ranking ever assigned to an asteroid was 4, last December, when an asteroid was given a 2% chance of striking the Earth in 2029. After detailed tracking of the asteroid's orbit, the object was reclassified to 0."
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2026&ncid=2026&e=4&u=/latimests/20050416/ts_latimes/asteroiddangerscalerevisedtobelessalarming
I've already said midway through my blog that the asteroid will come within 15,000 miles of earth.
:)
Still, that's awfully damn close.
Post a Comment