Associated Press vs Michelle Malkin

Looks like the Associated Press (AP) will finally get their hands full by entangling themselves, stupidly so, against Michelle Malkin. But what was surprising is that the AP agrees that even journalists interview terrorists rather than use the word "insurgents" instead, popular among the MSM.

Journalists interview and photograph murderers, child molesters, kidnappers, and, yes, even terrorists...

Is the AP admitting that their own AP "journalists" do in fact interview bad and evil guys? The Islamofascists kind? Is the AP admitting that Bilal Hussein is somehow, perhaps, a terrorist sympathizer which have allowed him to get up close and personal with real terrorists and their victims? Just so the AP can win the terrrorists' hearts and help their terror agenda? Was this a classic Freudian slip by the AP?

Why is the Associated Press going after Michelle Malkin right now when they have ignored, like Malkin said, Little Green Footballs and Powerlineblog? Is it because the conservative website Michelle Malkin has a lot of readership and that AP feels threatened by her blogging ability and news gathering based on common sense? Is it because the AP is like a deer caught in the headlight with them associating themselves as sympathizers of Islamic terrorists?

Lets look at the reach number between Michelle Malkin and AP and compare that with Little Green Footballs and Powerlineblog. Not suprised to see Michelle Malkin right up there not too far from the AP in terms of reach and page hits. Sounds like Michelle Malkin is definitely making an impact on the AP who believe that the ethics of journalism means they can be biased, sympathetic and one-sided.

Michelle doesn't think so. And so she reports on what they don't want readers to see or know.

Give 'em hell, Michelle.