Anti-Gay Patch for Mothers-to-be to Ensure Babies Born Straight?

Here's an article about the concept of having an anti-gay patch similar to a nicotine patch for Mothers-to-be to ensure that their babies be born straight (or how about a patch to ensure babies born hearing instead?):

It raises the prospect that pregnant women could one day be offered a treatment to reduce or eliminate the chance that their offspring will be homosexual. Experts say that, in theory, the “straightening” procedure on humans could be as simple as a hormone supplement for mothers-to-be, worn on the skin like an anti-smoking nicotine patch.
.
.
Potentially, the techniques could one day be adapted for human use, with doctors perhaps being able to offer parents pre-natal tests to determine the likely sexuality of offspring or a hormonal treatment to change the orientation of a child.

Interesting concept there.

Now, do parents have the right to ensure that their babies be born straight anymore than the right of a parent wanting to kill an unborn child because of a handicap issue? Or the right to an abortion just because one simply does not want a child? Isn't that also playing God, too?

Peter Tatchell, the gay rights campaigner, said: “These experiments echo Nazi research in the early 1940s which aimed at eradicating homosexuality. They stink of eugenics. There is a danger that extreme homophobic regimes may try to use these experimental results to change the orientation of gay people.”

He said that the techniques being developed in sheep could in future allow parents to “play God”.

Deciding the life of an unborn child because they don't want a child in the first place? Wouldn't that be considered an unnatural act, too? What about choosing the color of the baby's eyes? Or hair color? etc? How far is going too far in designing your own baby?

Saddam Hussein Hanging Video - Graphic! Uncut Version!

Finally, we get to the heart of the matter on getting the uncut version of Saddam Hussein's hanging with the full graphic and gore detail at the end of the rope.

Check it out. Be forewarned it is somewhat graphic at the end but it quickly ends Saddam's life his execution for the crimes of murdering and torturing thousands Iraqis.

If you watch the this cell phone camera video you can see you he said something right before the trapdoor was released. I believe it was "Mutqada".

Though this video version was taken with somebody's cell phone video camera and was leaked to the internet and finally picked up on YouTube. Still, the video shakes alot and a not a whole lot of lighting to enhance the contrast detail of the hanging. I suspect the full and clear and official uncut version will surface on the internet very soon.





UPDATE: Some say that Saddam said "Go to hell.." right before trapdoor was released.

UPDATE II: Another hanging video except this time it's a post-hanging video showing up close the gaping wound in Saddam's neck as he lie dead on a gurney covered with a body sheet.

What Does a Deaf Punk Muslim Indian Girl Think about Saddam's Hanging?

Here's a rare trifecta when you have a girl punk with pink RED spikey mohawk hair who sympathizes Saddam and is a deaf Muslim.

Saddam Hussein: RIP

May Saddam Hussein RIP.... he will face Allah. I am very angry that the USA was involved with this. Americans NEED TO STAY THE F*CK out of Arabic politics. They need to keep their white trash hands off our countries, our internal matters and our politics.

Saddam was a symbol of fervent Arab nationalism and pride. He was the lion of the Middle East.

Ive always founded Saddam fascinating. I remember growing up seeing his face plastered on posters across newspapers in northern England and in the village of Saharsa in Bihar, India. Every Muslim child knew who Saddam was--- and we all know he has NOTHING to do with 9-11.

Americans think Saddam died today for 9-11. Um, no. Saddam and the country of Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9-11.

Americans are so f*cking ignorant. You guys are f*cking pahetic and you all make me laugh.

Maybe she needs to grow up? And what are the odds that among the several hundred thousands that Saddam ordered the killing, murder, and/or torture that many of the the Muslim victims were deaf?

Yeah, right, rah rah for Saddam. *End sarcasm mode* Ever wonder why he called "The Butcher of Bagdad"?

Justice is served when the Iraqi people were able to carry out the court proceedings, sentencing and execution in the most legal way giving Saddam the chance to defend himself in court. Saddam had it easy compared to the thousands upon thousands who never had the chance to defend themselves against charges in court (or none at all) while Saddam was in charge. Why among the hundreds of mass graves uncovered in Iraq showed that nearly 60% of them were women and children? And this girl want to sympathize with Saddam? I have absolutely no sympathy for him at all. He was a monster! And so were his sons, Uday and Qusay.

UPDATE: A reminder to those why Saddam Hussein was executed and why saying "RIP" is not the way to express sympathy to Saddam. Doing so is advocating that it was alright for Saddam to order the killings of hundred of thousands (750,000 murdered) Iraqis under his watch.

MASS GRAVES.

Saddam Hussein Hanging Video - GRAPHIC!

LiveLeak has the full graphic video tape of Saddam Hussein's execution by hanging from start to end. It IS graphic towards the end of his rope falling approxiately 1 meter until the rope went taut. Yahoo has pictures of the aftermath for the less squeamish.

Saddam didn't go out with a smile as he said he would be with fear and trepidation instead as I have speculated it would happen. And since he is dead, there are 13 hours left as of this writing until he is properly buried according Muslim tradition on burying their dead within 24 hours. No time for autopsy but you can get the general idea of how one dies from a hanging by reading here.

Saddam's dead. Move on and stop with the peacenik hang wringing will ya like this teenaged valley girl on YouTube feeling sorry for Saddam! Justice was served and Saddam had it easy compared to the hundred of thousands he ordered killed, tortured and executed unmercifully.

UPDATE: Gateway Pundit has the YouTube video of Saddam's hanging since the LiveLeak.com removed the video.

UPDATE II: Here's the LiveLeak video again after it was removed earlier (?).




UPDATE III: Here's a rare trifecta when you have a girl punk with a pink mohawk who is Saddam sympathizer and is a deaf Muslim who has something to say about the hanging.

UPDATE IV: Finally, YouTube has the full uncut graphic version of the hanging.

,

UPDATE: Another hanging video except this time it's a post-hanging video showing up close the gaping wound in Saddam's neck as he lie dead on a gurney covered with a body sheet.

Saddam to be hanged within hours?

(scroll down to see latest update)

Michelle Malkin has more on the scoop with reports that Saddam will go hanging with a smile on his face. Doubt that will happen once he feels the noose around his neck. Also, a few questions about the hanging. Will the judicial hanging be the short drop, standard drop or long drop? Go to Richard Clark's website (no, not that Richard A. Clarke) on the details on hangings, how hanging causes death and the equipment used in hangings.

Quite an interesting read.

Be forwarned. Some links contain graphic images. Though it'll be interesting to know how long the rope will be used to hang Saddam and see whether it measures up accordingly/appropriately to body weight and height seen in the drop tables. Also, another question. Will Saddam be hooded? Or will he go about unhooded with a smile on his face?

Hanging was used extensively in Iraq during Saddam's rule, ironically so. It is still the preferred method under the new government.

UPDATE: Read more over at Gateway Pundit.

UPDATE II: Reports have it that Saddam is now dead! Read Allah Pundit. Expect video of Saddam's hanging out soon. Maybe on YouTube?

UPDATE III: Foxnews is reporting via satellite that Iraqis in Sadr city is celebrating the execution.

UPDATE IV: Will CNN show the tape of the hanging or will they say it's against their policy to show snuff film? Which big liberal media will be the first to decry the inhumanity on hanging Saddam?

UPDATE V: Will Ramsey Clark, a U.S. lawyer who represented Saddam Hussein, now write a book about his time with Saddam and the trials in Iraq? Will Clark make money off of a dead dictator? Ramsey Clark did write two books. One in 2005 "The Fire This Time: U.S. War Crimes in the Gulf" and in 1992 "War Crimes: A Report on U.S. War Crimes Against Iraq (Activism, Politics, Culture, Theory, Vol. 3)"

UPDATE VI: Ramsey Clark wrote many more books. Even on Slobodan Milosevic -"The Defense Speaks: For History and the Future" by Slobodan Milosevic and Ramsey Clark. You can bet your bottom dollar there'll be some write-ups by Ramsey Clark on Saddam Hussein based on his book writing history. A dead man tells no tells? Try a lawyer this time.

UPDATE VII: Picture of Saddam with rope around his neck!

UPDATE VIII: Will Ford’s funeral get pre-empted by the MSM with Saddam’s funeral (or the coming days of discussions on Saddam's execution) where Ford will lie in state at the Capital Rotunda this Saturday night as part of the 6 days of National mourning that started today? According to Muslim tradition, a Muslim body must be buried within 24 hours. Ford's funeral begins at 5:20 PM (Eastern time) tomorrow with the motorcade to the Rotunda which would place it nearly 20 hours after Saddam's execution.

UPDATE IX: CNN begin's the first MSM's "pre-emption" of Ford's funeral in favor of Saddam.

UPDATE X: Reports have it that Saddam went before the noose with fear on his face and not smiling as he said he would do. Will still photos of the execution coming soon show that fear in his face and eyes? Will MSM, upon seeing the photos, try and show some kind of sympathy towards Saddam on the "inhumanity" of the hanging of a human being monster?

UPDATE XI: HotAir has the Foxnews video clip of Saddam's hanging as guards prepare noose around his neck.

UPDATE XII: LiveLeak.com has the full graphic video of Saddam's hanging from start to end. Contains graphic images.

UbiDuo is Now Available!

At 8 PM last night the sComm, Inc website was given a total make-over with better details, never before seen information and description of the up and coming soon-to-be popular communication device called "UbiDuo" (Yoo-bee Duo). This is a much needed communication device that meets all of the ADA compliance requirements for all businesses that deal with deaf clients and/or customers. The UbiDuo is not simply a communication device for deaf people, it is much more than that.



Check it out.


The development of UbiDuo took two years of intensive engineering development and approximately 250 beta testers tried out the UbiDuo to help ensure it to become a top quality communication device that is unrivaled by any other product on the market today. Since 2002 the wholly deaf-owned company sComm has come a long way from a dream to a working reality.

On the new sComm website you can also see a story about me on how I played a pivotal role when I helped introduce Greg Gunderson to Jason Curry and unwittingly re-united two old friends going back 25 years. And because of that connection, which sent chills up and down our spine upon hearing it, things got even better afterwards between the two friends.

A hearty congratulation goes to Jason Curry and to all of the hard working UbiDuo team to turn UbiDuo into a reality that will help deaf people become that much more independent that ever before.

Also as a side note, this exclusive UbiDuo announcement on Kokonut Pundits would make it my 1005th blog post since its inception on October 22, 2004. This is the equivalent of 1.3 blogs a day for 778 days which would, arguably so, make me to be one of the most, if not the most, prolific deaf/hh blogger around.

All in all, congrats to Jason Curry who is already off to a flying start!


Check out all Kokonut Pundits stories on Greg Gunderson and sComm.
Check out all Kokonut Pundits stories on sComm and UbiDuo.
Check out all Kokonut Pundits stories with sComm, Inc in them.

When Deafness Kills

Well, these things do happen. Sadly tho. There was another deafness-related death today when a person with a hearing loss did not hear the sound of his impending doom from an approaching bus. Tragic. Also, remember earlier this year when we had the awful death of Miss Deaf Texas who was killed by a train, unable to hear the train horn's warning blast up to the last possible moment? Well, this time it was a moving bus when a cyclist peddled right into the front of the bus. The cyclist usually wears his hearing aid but this time he didn't.

A cyclist who died after pulling out in front of a tourist bus on SH1 between Taupiri and Ngaruawahia did not hear the bus approach, a coroner has found.

The Voyager Coachlines bus that killed 65-year-old Hamilton photographer Peter Goldfinch had deficient brakes, but did not cause the September 26 crash.

Coroner Bob McDermott said at an inquest at Huntly District Court on Thursday that Mr Goldfinch had moved into the southbound lane without checking for approaching traffic.

Inattentivity, carelessness and perhaps not listening resulted in this tragedy. But I can't fault them and besides, hearing people have been killed in those same instances. Even with a hearing aid you can still get hit by a bus. Inattentiveness can kill.

Ching Chonged

Here's a new definition of mine thanks to Rosie O'Donnell.

Ching Chonged – adj; an attempt at “de minimus” racist humor and be non-politically correct at the same time.

Example:

Rosie O’Donnell – “"You know, you can imagine in China it's like `ching chong, ching chong chong, Danny DeVito, ching chong chong chong, drunk.”

Did she ching chonged?

You bet.

Donation to Swift Vets and POWs for Truth

Well, it was worth every penny of it. Swift Vets and POWs for Truth was fined today by the Federal Election Commission for violating campaign finance laws. A fine of $299,500 was levied against the organization. The organization ran their website starting in April 2004 right up to November 3 when John Kerry lost the election.

Swift Boat Veterans, which led the attack on Democratic Senator John Kerry's war record, received $4.5 million from Houston builder Bob Perry.

Though the Swift Vets closed its organization a long time ago.

The Swift Boat group also has closed its doors, according to retired Admiral Roy Hoffmann, who founded the organization. ``It is far better to end this legal confrontation now rather than continue a costly battle against government bureaucrats in an area where the law is unconscionably vague,'' he said.

It was worth every penny from April 2004 to November 2004 the website ran to counter John Kerry. That's the equivalent of about $1620 a day. But since the organization is closed, who will foot the bill? Admiral Roy Hoffmann? Or will the Houston builder Bob Perry?

Perhaps set up a donation for the now inactive organization (unless John Kerry is stupid enough to try and run again for 2008) to help pay for the FEC fine?

Suggestions anyone?

Dr. Davila - Political Ideology vs Gallaudet Ideology

A few days ago I posted a congratulatory note to Dr. Davila for being picked as interim president of Gallaudet University. I also made a note of Dr. Davila's political preference which was that of a Republican/Conservative "solely" on the basis that he donated $250.00 to the RNC. It wasn't from just one example I based my conclusion on but I did that on purpose to see what people would say. Guess I was right.

I was lambasted by a few knee jerkers saying that I was assuming that Dr. Davila was a Republican/Conservative or that I didn't do enough to discern Dr. Davila's true ideology (ie the label of Republican/Conservative) or leanings. All because I used only one example in my blog about his contribution of $250.00 to the RNC?

Little do they know.

Yet the political donation search site is VERY CLEAR that there are other earlier campaign cycles going back to 1980 and anyone can do a search on "Davila, Robert" going back to 1980. I clearly posted that link in my recent blog. Just that 2002 happens to be the earliest and most recent donation to the GOP by Dr. Davila. The rest was up to readers to find out how much he has donated to the GOP. I guess that didn't happen. Did it?

The total amount donated to the GOP was $2600.00 vs $250.00 to Democrat Stephanie Aldersley who is a friend of Davila. That was the only thing I didn't uncover and that was on the friendship connection. Hattip goes to MAS on that one. Here is the rest of the donation given to the GOP by Dr. Robert Davila.


2002 Election Cycle

DAVILA, ROBERT
9/8/2002 $250.00
, NY 14623
R I T [Contribution]
STEPHANIE ALDERSLEY FOR CONGRESS

Davila, RobertR. Mr.
7/24/2002 $250.00
Rochester, NY 14623
Rochester Institute Of Technol/Univ [Contribution]
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE


1996 Election Cycle

DAVILA, ROBERT DR
4/10/1995 $250.00
WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603
[Contribution]
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE

DAVILA, ROBERT DR
4/14/1995 $350.00
WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603
[Contribution]
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE

DAVILA, ROBERT DR
5/8/1996 $1,000.00
WHITE PLAINS, NY 10603
NEW YORK SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF [Contribution]
NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE


1994 Election Cycle

DAVILA, ROBERT DR
9/24/1993 $250.00
LANHAM, MD 20706
[Contribution]
REPUBLICAN FUND FOR THE 90'S


1992 Election Cycle

DAVILA, ROBERT R
10/9/1992 $500.00
LANHAM, MD 20706
[Contribution]
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE - RNC


Now, we have a good idea about Davila's political ideology or leanings but would that interfere/support his Gallaudet's ideology as interim president? Or should that not at all be a concern? The focus, however, *is* on Gallaudet University and not about a person's political leanings. Right? Yet it was interesting, even disturbing, to see one Deaf person call Dr. Davila a "dickwad" earlier this year in January just because he only donated $250.00 to the RNC in 2002. I wonder what he would say now if he found out that he donated up to $2600.00 to the GOP?

Now, shouldn't a public internet apology from him to Dr. Davila be a reasonable expectation considering that he congratulated Dr. Davila (even though he wanted Weiner) who is a Republican/Conservative? Will he apologize? Or not? But the irony is even more in all this when he said,

"I want all Democrats in the BoT."

Why did he say that? So, political leanings do matter on the campus of Gallaudet? Seems so to him. And now we have a Republican/Conservative who is now the interim president of Gallaudet University.

How ironic life is.

Congrats to Dr. Robert Davila

Congratulations to Dr. Robert Davila on becoming the interim president for Gallaudet University. Also, nice to see a Republican/Conservative taking the helm of Gallaudet University where Dr. Davila donated $250 to the Republican National Committee in 2002 seen here (type in "Davila, Robert" and be sure to click on "2002 Election Cycle"). Regardless of that interesting info, from here on out it's time to push forward.

When British Documentary Makers Lie about a Republican Congresswoman

I found this over at HotAir about the purported claim by British documentary makers of “638 Ways to Kill Castro" that they caught Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who is a Republican Congresswoman from Florida and a ranking member of the House International Relations Committee, who called for Castro's death by assassination. The exact claimed quote:

I welcome the opportunity of having anyone assassinate Fidel Castro and any leader who is oppressing the people.

If you listen closely she says "I" twice as if she was stuttering right before she says "welcome." This is where I believe the audio splice took place to cover up the word "won't" if you lip read it closely without the sound. I believe she said "but" as the first word uttered in the close up video portion of the clip but that was masked over with the two "I" words as if she was stuttering a bit at the beginning. Under normal speed the word "won't" is spoken rather quickly and hard to catch since it happens almost immediately in the second portion of the clip when the camera pans up close to her face. This would be the best place to tamper an audio section between video breaks just enough so anybody wouldn't really notice it under normal viewing and listening scenarios.



Firstly, I noticed her demeanor in body language, her head mostly, as if she is saying and expressing things in the negative in the up close clip portion. Her head seems to shake left and right as in "no" and not up and down in the affirmative like you would see in the 1st half of that clip about how proud she is to represent many Cuban freedom fighters who are now exhiled in the United States and on the island. Her facial expression in the up close video was more scrunched up as if she was expressing in a more serious tone as if she was trying to say something in the negative or something with a tone of disapproval.

The video is fine. Just the audio portion that's been tampered with, which I can hear all the words anyway. Her lip-movements do not jive at all with the claimed transcript at the very beginning in the up close video portion. I can tell just by turning off the volume and read her lips by slowing it down right at the beginning of the second half of the clip with her face up close did I see the difference. I had to repeat this clip portion many times over until I realized that the first word right before "welcome" does indeed start with a "w" letter and the the word "won't" seem to follow well with her lip-movements and body language rather than the two stuttered words "I".."I" that were surreptiously added with the extra personal pronoun "I".

She correctly says this when you read her lips without the sound,

"...but I won't welcome the opportunity of having anyone assassinate Fidel Castro and any leader who is oppressing the people."

But in the tampered audio provided by the makers of a British documentary, “638 Ways to Kill Castro," the clip incorrectly says,

"..I...I welcome the opportunity of having anyone assassinate Fidel Castro and any leader who is oppressing the people."

Now, what is exactly the agenda of this British documentary makers anyway?

UPDATE: Looking at again, I know a "w" lettered word was said before she said "welcome". That's a fact. Whether it's "won't" or "would" is the point of contention here. In fact, I'm inclined now to see that she said "but would I welcome". It does seem more plausible with the lip movements now and that would be consisent with her demeanor and body language. It's also more grammatically correct than "won't". In fact, the clip cuts it off her talk at the begining (of the second clip) and at the end where she seems to continue to talk but was cut off as well. In fact, at the end she seemed to have shrugged a little bit before getting cut off which may indicate that she was answering a question.

We do, however, know that the audio has been messed around with and we don't know what she said before and after (in the second clip) when editing was done. The audio still contain the two "I"s to cover up the visual video gap where her lip movements said "would I" to make it sound like she stuttered a bit there.

Hattip: DrM2B.

Climate Porn

A September 15, 2006 Reuters News article claimed that polar bears in the Arctic are threatened with extinction by global warming. The article by correspondent Alister Doyle, quoted a visitor to the Arctic who claims he saw two distressed polar bears. According to the Reuters article, the man noted that “one of [the polar bears] looked to be dead and the other one looked to be exhausted.” The article did not state the bears were actually dead or exhausted, rather that they “looked” that way.

Have we really arrived at the point where major news outlets in the U.S. are reduced to analyzingwhether or not polar bears in the Arctic appear restful? How does reporting like this get approved for publication by the editors at Reuters? What happened to covering the hard science of this issue?

What was missing from this Reuters news article was the fact that according to biologists who study the animals, polar bears are doing quite well. Biologist Dr. Mitchell Taylor from the Arctic government of Nunavut, a territory of Canada, refuted these claims in May when he noted that “Of the 13 populations of polar bears in Canada, 11 are stable or increasing in number. They are not going extinct, or even appear to be affected at present.”

Sadly, it appears that reporting anecdotes and hearsay as fact, has now replaced the basic tenets of journalism for many media outlets.

ALARMISM HAS LED TO SKEPTICISM

It is an inconvenient truth that so far, 2006 has been a year in which major segments of the media have given up on any quest for journalistic balance, fairness and objectivity when it comes to climate change. The global warming alarmists and their friends in the media have attempted to smear scientists who dare question the premise of man-made catastrophic global warming, and as a result some scientists have seen their reputations and research funding dry up.

The media has so relentlessly promoted global warming fears that a British group called the Institute for Public Policy Research – and this from a left leaning group – issued a report in 2006 accusing media outlets of engaging in what they termed “climate porn” in order to attract the public’s attention.

Bob Carter, a Paleoclimate geologist from James Cook University in Australia has described how the media promotes climate fear:

“Each such alarmist article is larded with words such as ‘if’, ‘might’, ‘could’, ‘probably’, ‘perhaps’, ‘expected’, ‘projected’ or ‘modeled’ - and many involve such deep dreaming, or ignorance of scientific facts and principles, that they are akin to nonsense,” professor Carter concluded in an op-ed in April of this year.

Another example of this relentless hype is the reporting on the seemingly endless number of global warming impact studies which do not even address whether global warming is going to happen. They merely project the impact of potential temperature increases.

The media endlessly hypes studies that purportedly show that global warming could increase mosquito populations, malaria, West Nile Virus, heat waves and hurricanes, threaten the oceans, damage coral reefs, boost poison ivy growth, damage vineyards, and global food crops, to name just a few of the global warming linked calamities. Oddly, according to the media reports, warmer temperatures almost never seem to have any positive effects on plant or animal life or food production.

Fortunately, the media’s addiction to so-called ‘climate porn’ has failed to seduce many Americans.

According to a July Pew Research Center Poll, the American public is split about evenly between those who say global warming is due to human activity versus those who believe it’s from natural factors or not happening at all.

In addition, an August Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll found that most Americans do not attribute the cause of recent severe weather events to global warming, and the portion of Americans who believe global warming is naturally occurring is on the rise.

Yes -- it appears that alarmism has led to skepticism.

The American people know when their intelligence is being insulted. They know when they are being used and when they are being duped by the hysterical left.

The American people deserve better -- much better -- from our fourth estate. We have a right to expect accuracy and objectivity on climate change coverage. We have a right to expect balance in sourcing and fair analysis from reporters who cover the issue.

Above all, the media must roll back this mantra that there is scientific “consensus” of impending climatic doom as an excuse to ignore recent science. After all, there was a so-called scientific “consensus” that there were nine planets in our solar system until Pluto was recently demoted.

Breaking the cycles of media hysteria will not be easy since hysteria sells -- it’s very profitable. But I want to challenge the news media to reverse course and report on the objective science of climate change, to stop ignoring legitimate voices this scientific debate and to stop acting as a vehicle for unsubstantiated hype.

SOURCE - by Senator InHofe.

UPDATE: The link (or "Source") to Inhofe's site 66-page guide has been removed. I could probably guess why. But go here to a Google cache link and you can still read his report.

Global Warming Screamers

You know the type. These "global warming screamers" who go about their constant gloom and doom scenario that earth is warming up alarmingly that it'll melt the poles' ice caps and Greenland causing world wide havoc with rising sea waters and what not, caused by human beings. Even a few deaf people joined to be among the screamers. And Gallaudet, too. And how ironic it was over 30 years ago the press were screaming about global cooling!

Heck, I think in the next 30 years we ought to be more worried about nuclear war than this global warming idiocy.

Senator James M. Inhofe is one of those skeptics who don't believe in this global warming and he recently produced a 66-page guide called "A Skeptic’s Guide to Debunking Global Warming Alarmism. Hot & Cold Media Spin Cycle: A Challenge to Journalists who Cover Global Warming."

Read it!

UPDATE: In short, we should consider the sun as the main culprit over long term trend on climate change. Read a recent article on how the number of sun spots the have influenced temperature changes on earth:


The team started by using sunspot records to calibrate models of how carbon-14 in tree rings correlate withsolar activity. The models "reproduce the observed record of sunspots extremely well, from almost no sunspots during the seventeenth century to the current high levels", writes Paula Reimer, a paleoclimate expert at Queen's University, Belfast, UK, in an article accompanying the research paper in Nature.

They then extrapolated the tree ring data backwards in time and discovered that no period in the last 8000 years has been as active as the last 70. About 75 sunspots have appeared every year in this period, compared to an annual average of about 30 over the last 11,400 years.

"We are living in extraordinary times as far as solar activity is concerned," says study co-author Manfred Schussler. "Extended periods of high activity seem to be much more rare than we previously thought."

Indeed, the data also showed that high activity periods only occurred for about 10% of the period studied, and tended to last for about three decades. "That's one of the interesting things - this latest cycle has already lasted longer than most do," says Reimer.


UPDATE II: The link to Inhofe's site 66-page guide has been removed from the Environment and Public Work website after only a few days. I could probably guess why since IT IS a senate.gov site. But go here to a Google cache link (or here for the actual Google reference) and you can still read his report. Pass it around.

UPDATE III: Looks like the despot U.N. is trying to be the less of a global warming screamer now by reducing and revising their estimates on global warming impact. Nice little chuckle there for a good read on U.N.'s idiocy. I wonder if Kofi objected to the change. Oops! Too late, he's gone.

UPDATE IV: It's baaackkkk! The link to the 66-page guide on debunking Global Warming. Hat tip: Curious Eyes.

Bill Richardson - Anti-border? Pro-illegal?

Well, I'm sure you heard the news that Gov. Richardson is running for U.S. president in 2008. Or maybe not with the continued Fox news bashing. But perhaps it was Bill's own mistake when he mis-spoke?

If Gov. Bill Richardson made a mistake in his interview with Fox News on Thursday, it was a brilliant one.

For a day at least, the governor was the Democrat who had people wondering if he really will run for president. And the interview - the one that his campaign staff says was "taken out of context" - came the same day he was already parading across the national stage.

By 4 p.m., when Fox's "breaking news" ticker scrolled across its Web site saying Richardson had said he was running for president, the Governor's Office in Santa Fe was in a tizzy, with phones ringing like a hurricane command center.

Taken out of context? Maybe. Or did he simply misspeak? Could be.

Regardless, Richardson created such a buzz that the real question soon will be not whether he's running but why is he bothering to continue the charade.

But Richardson still called on Congress not to build the 700 miles of fence on the U.S. Mexico border. Well, he does want to build a fence...to protect livestock in his state of emergency Executive Order last year.

====================================
State of New Mexico Office of the
Governor Bill Richardson
News Release

Governor Makes $1.75 million available to assist state and local law enforcement in border communities For Immediate Release Contact: Pahl Shipley August 12, 2005 (505) 476-2202

COLUMBUS, NM- Governor Bill Richardson today issued an Executive Order declaring a state of emergency along the New Mexico-Mexico border, specifically in Doña Ana, Luna, Grant, and Hidalgo counties. The Governor made the announcement following a helicopter and ground tour of the border near Columbus, New Mexico.

“As Governor I have a responsibility to protect our citizens, property, and communities,” said Governor Richardson. “Recent developments have convinced me this action is necessary- including violence directed at law enforcement, damage to property and livestock, increased evidence of drug smuggling, and an increase in the number of undocumented immigrants.”

Governor Richardson’s declaration makes $750,000 in state emergency funding immediately available to the affected counties. The Governor pledged an additional $1 million in assistance for the area. The funds will be used to support state and local law enforcement efforts, create and fund a field office for the New Mexico Office of Homeland Security to coordinate assistance to the area, and help build a fence to protect a livestock yard near Columbus, along a favorite path for illegal immigration where a number of livestock have been stolen and killed.

The Governor also called on Mexico to bulldoze the abandoned town of Las Chepas, which is directly over the border from Columbus. Las Chepas is a notorious staging and resting area for those who smuggle drugs and immigrants into the United States.

“I’m taking these serious steps because of the urgency of the situation and, unfortunately, because of the total inaction and lack of resources from the federal government and Congress,” added the Governor. “We will continue to work with the federal government in an attempt to get their assistance, but something had to be done immediately. I want the people of Doña Ana, Luna, Hidalgo, and Grant counties to know my administration is doing everything it can to protect them.”

The Governor also directed the New Mexico Department of Agriculture to work with the New Mexico Livestock Board to assess the security and safety of livestock in this border region. Governor Richardson also received support today from the Mexican state of Chihuahua.

The Chihuahua Secretary of Industrial Development, Alejandro Cano, says Chihuahua will fully support the Governor in dealing with the situation along the border.


EXECUTIVE ORDER 2005-040 DECLARING A DISASTER IN HIDALGO, LUNA, DONA ANA, AND GRANT COUNTIES DUE TO BORDER SECURITY CONCERNS

WHEREAS, the Southern border of New Mexico has been devastated by the ravages and terror of human smuggling, drug smuggling, kidnapping, murder, destruction of property and the death of livestock;

WHEREAS, the border separating the State of New Mexico and the Country of Mexico is in an extreme state of disrepair and is inadequately funded or safeguarded to protect the lives and property of New Mexican citizens;

WHEREAS, State and local law enforcement officials have utilized all available resources to combat border security concerns, but these efforts have not alleviated this emergency or prevented the loss of life or destruction of property;
WHEREAS, this situation constitutes an emergency condition with potentially catastrophic consequences.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Bill Richardson, Governor of the State of New Mexico, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and Laws of the State of New Mexico do hereby declare an emergency condition exists in the counties of Hidalgo, Luna, Dona Ana, and Grant due to a lack of security on New Mexico's Southern border with the Country of Mexico.

I FURTHER DIRECT the Department of Finance and Administration to provide emergency financial resources in the amount of $750,000 to the Department of Public Safety, under the direction of the Governor's Office of Homeland Security and the Governor's authorized representative. The Department of Public Safety is directed to coordinate all requests for assistance and responses to such requests under the authority of and as determined by the Governor or his Authorized Representative pursuant to and in accordance with Sections 6-7-1 through 6-7-3 NMSA 1978.

I FURTHER DIRECT all Cabinet Departments and agencies of the State of New Mexico to provide any assistance that may be requested by the Department of Public Safety or the Governor's Office of Homeland Security subject to approval by the Governor’s Authorized Representative.

===================

Maybe we should be thankful that Bill is serious about building a better fence to protect livestock on U.S. soil? I'm sure Islamofascists will like hearing this one.

All Deaf Dogs Go to Heaven

Check out the cartoon and the story I covered recently on this subject. You'll have to read the story and links about Deaf Dog going to the dogs to understand the cartoon's joke.





Hat tip: Anonymous. Thanks! Go here for the source.

Anybody want to buy the coffee shop and the franchise name?

Trapped Deaf Dog Dead? Deaf Dog and Stafbucks?

A deaf dog trapped for two weeks on a cliff ledge near a golf course. After two weeks of being fed with food scrap, no more barking was heard.

So much for international news.

In other news, locally this time, is Deaf Dog, a local favorite coffee house that closed their doors catching many patrons off guard.

Deaf Dog customers were stunned to find their favorite coffee shop on Petaluma Boulevard North closed on Monday morning. After 12 years, owner Ron Salisbury has gone out of business and closed all Deaf Dog stores.

Gone to the dogs, I guess (and here).

Though one commenter said:

Deaf Dog seemed to exist just to hate Starbucks, and hating something — even Starbucks — is bad karma.

Here is what Deaf Dog website looked like before.

And if you like Starbucks, and want to meet other Deaf/deaf/hh people at Starbucks or other coffee locations visit Deaf Chat Coffee to find your nearest location where you can sit down, sip your favorite coffee or mocha and talk about, well, deaf dogs.

Students Against Free Speech

I guess it must take an extremist to try and prevent a speaker from speaking at a college?

Violence erupted at a Michigan law school Thursday when protestors tried to block a speech by Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo.

Why? Was it because Tancredo against those who enter the United States illegally?

Michigan State University College Republicans and Young Americans for Freedom sponsored the event.

Tancredo went to Michigan State University College of Law as part of a visit to the state to talk about immigration. He leads the group that opposes legal status for illegal immigrants.

Protestors interrupted the speech with loud shouting.

Very mature of them.

"They declared ahead of time on Facebook that they would not allow me to speak," Tancredo said in the e-mail.

I think they deserve an "F" for being idiots they are.