Let's look at what people are saying about Fernandes and ASL despite the fact that there are other modes of communication that are being used by deaf and hard of hearing people all across the United States. These include SEE, Cued Speech (see video here with Closed Captioning and sign language interpreter), CART, lip-reading, and even auditory-oral (listening and speaking).
1. A Guest Blogger on DeafRead breakdown on Dr. Jane K. Fernandes as being not "ASL-enough".
2. Reflexivity has a good break down about that "grey area":
"I suggest that the real challenge from the Deaf community to Dr. Fernandes is whether she will use her position to promote a clear separation between the languages and establish communication policies that don't unfairly privilege either group (the sight-dependent or the sight/sound co-dependent).
3. DeafDC has a new discussion on "The Deaf Standpoint: Does JKF Understand?" It covers both ends (hearing and Deaf) as well as those in the middle "grey area" which many people are purposely trying to marginalize when it comes to communication preferences and needs.
My question is this.
Are some of the people at Gallauadet University deliberately trying to, somehow, circumvent this very Federal law called "Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act" by making ASL as the only mode of communication on the campus of Gallaudet University? Are some of the faculty members trying to somehow to limit severely the alternative forms of communication needs for deaf and hard of hearing students who may have alternative preferred choices or needs? Are protesters encouraging Gallaudet University to ignore and marginalize the Section 504 requirements for people with disabilities, including those with hearing loss, by allowing them equal participation in an educational process other than ASL?
What about Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., Rep. Ray LaHood, R-Ill., and Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., all voting members of Gallaudet's Board of Trustees? What messages are they getting about the protest? Ignore Section 504, which is a FEDERAL LAW, that directly applies to Gallaudet University?
Now, what is this "Section 504"? Well, Section 504, which by the way the National Association of the Deaf agrees with this Federal statute, explains that:
Access for people who are deaf or hard of hearing
Generally, people who are deaf or hard of hearing request assistive listening devices, *16
captioning, *17 CART *18 (Communication Access Realtime Translation--similar to captioning but confined to a laptop or projection screen), or sign language interpreters. *19
The Commission is equipped with fixed FM assistive listening systems in the Commission Meeting Room and in Conference Room 1 on the 8th floor. In addition, there are 2 portable FM systems that can be used throughout the building and at remote locations. The systems are outfitted with microphones, earphones, and neckloops. *20 Captioning, CART, and sign language interpreters are services that are frequently contracted from outside vendors. In the DC area, such services are widely used with demand often out-stripping supply. As much advance notice as possible is needed to assure that appropriate services can be acquired. The Commission also has several sign language interpreters on staff who assist in making Commission events accessible.
People who are deaf or hard of hearing may use other accommodations such as oral interpreters, *21 cued speech transliterators, *22 tactile interpreters, *23 and notetakers.."
Note, it says "sign language" which is a broad definition and not specifically "ASL." So, therein lies the problem...for the protesters.
Under the ADA and Section 504, interpreters are considered an "auxiliary aid or service." Post-secondary educational institutions must "furnish appropriate auxiliary aids and services where necessary to ensure effective communication with individuals with disabilities" - 28 C.F.R. § 35.160. And this "service" can include anywhere from ASL, SEE, CART, oral/voice interpreter to Cued Speech. There is no avoiding this law requirement, especially for Gallaudet University since any colleges or universities that receive federal monies are subject to the requirements under Section 504.
And now my last question. Why did protesters say in the beginning that this protest was not about JKF being "not Deaf enough" but now we're seeing talks from protesters on language and cultural identity against her? Is this a decline of revolution?
See more at "The Politics of Being Deaf ".

