Sunday, May 15, 2005

A Gang of Gay (Bi?) Murderers?

Here we may be witnessing a gang that sodomizes their victims before killing them. Who are these murderous gangs?
In the woods near Dallas, an innocent 21-year-old man was shot in the head, his remains eaten by animals. His pants were pulled down, and police suspect that he may have been sodomized.
A vicious gang they are, no doubt.

But there are other types of "gangs" of a different intention, nonetheless still serious.

Consider the radical homosexual agenda exposed in the Homosexual
Manifesto, authored by Michael Swift, published February 15, 1987 issue of the homosexual newspaper Gay Community News, and was reprinted in the 15-21 February 1987 Congressional Record: "We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all-male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherevermen are with men together.

Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. "The complete manifesto can be read at: <http://members.ll.net/chiliast/> following the link on the left to Homosexual Manifesto.

What a nutty world we're living in.

However, there are two issues regarding the sodomization of victims.
It's become a maxim that rape and other sex crimes are not about sex. They are about power. If Moyer did in fact abuse the unconscious girl, as Mitchell believed he did, that act would have had more to do with Moyer's desire to exert some control over the girl than any other desire he might have harbored. By the same token, experts contend, if Nestor battered Moyer's testicles with a club, forced him to sodomize himself with the club, and then carved a mark on his nipple, then that too was a sex crime that had little to do with sex.

Power? Fetish? Desire? Sexual exploitation? Who knows? Still, it's ugly.

No comments: