Thursday, September 13, 2007

A Cordial Response to Jeff Carlson

Today's comment by Jeff Carlson in his own blog.

My response:

If you had respect for me, Jeff, then why not admit the fact that you were wrong considering how I do my YouTube search every 2 to 3 weeks using only the search tag word "deaf". YouTube has a "date added" button which leaves me only to scan two or three pages worth of videos that were recently added. Yet you desperately wanted to believe otherwise for some odd reason. Are you forming your opinion on your own or from other people interjecting into yours? Remember, you said the "deaf p0rn" search terms weren't your idea in the first place. So, who is doing the influencing on your part in forming an opinion based on false assumptions? You need to consider the sources of your bias first. It serves no purpose to blog like that in the deaf community other than to raise awareness on the libel and defamation issue. Or are you suggesting that the deaf community follow your lead that it is alright to libel and defame people on the internet? What gives?

Also, you have not explained your reason why you think that way when the method of my search is plaintively obvious by using only one word, "deaf," and then hit the button to organize the video results from earliest to latest entry. This is a commonly used method when reviewing the latest video uploads. But using the "conservative" meme as a source of your explaination (a la Senator Craig, et al), if that is the case, isn't worth a dime but an excuse to libel me on purpose, which has no merit in of itself using the party line approach.

And if you want to go about the subject of "misguided" you need to look again on what you wrote about how I did my YouTube search. The Deaf Bunny YouTube video was only 5 days old when I came across it when I used the "deaf" search term and hit the "date added" button to organize the video entry. It was on the first page when I saw it and was surprised that a deaf owned porn company even existed. I have never heard such a thing before and so I blogged about it. And because of that I learned about PoleCat Pictures from another commenter which I haven't heard before either. Otherwise your logic would be saying that I put down "deaf p0rn" every two or three weeks on YouTube to see if there's anything related to deaf porn over the last year or so when YouTube popularity was on the rise until one day I finally came across a video that actually had a deaf porn video in it. You tell me the logic in that thinking.

It's all about common sense, Jeff. There is no need for me to look at anything specific in YouTube when all I need to do is use the search tag word "deaf" and organize the list by earliest to latest and pick a few videos. An pick the ones that catches my interest and see what people are saying. This is part of my research pattern and a way for me to learn more on what's going on out there.

However, it is extremely hard for me to believe a person who says he has "tremendous respect" for me but at the same time calls me a liar and a pervert in a blog. Why should I even bother to meet with you, which would be nice as I have met many other bloggers earlier this year at the vlog/blog conference at Gally, when you have not shown any respect to me in your blog in the first place? Do you not understand the seriousness of libel and defamation? Or do you actually think it's all a big joke? And if you haven't heard what Murphy's Law is about I suggest you read up on that. And if I am "misguided" then you need to explain how I am "misguided" and in what way. But for now try and see that from my perspective for a change considering what you have done lately. Right now, Jeff, you do not have my respect at heart at all.

UPDATE: Jeff has gone off the deep end. Sorry, Jeff. You have lost total respect from me for a guy who continues to lie about his so-called respect for me.

Along with his imagination running wild. He has knowingly lied from the beginning to end. Misguided he is. With none of the wits. And for a guy who can't even get it right the first and last time using common sense certainly begs the question his IQ. No need to address this issue when I've been correct all along. Let's move this along and bury this dung.

UPDATE II: Saw just the short blurb in EXTRA Deafread rather than reading the whole thing, seems like he's having an existential meltdown, basically so. Reminds me of that caveman commercial, too. Can't help but laugh at that one commercial.

UPDATE III: Now, he's a little, ahem, "obsessed" with me. Maybe that's an understatement?

No comments: