I was reading a blog that Deaf culture was dying because of cochlear implants and stem cells; and apparently the blogger (or so-called pundit) was proud of that “fact,” which was the reason why I published this blog post.There is a caveat at the very beginning of my blog "Will Deaf Culture Die Someday? " in my first paragraph.
There is always a possibility that Deaf culture could die out and this is dependent on a variety of factors with some of them going against the spread of Deaf culture and its language, ASL. But at this point it's probably more of a matter of "if" and not "when."It's pretty clear what I wrote was a matter of "if" and not when.
I'm pretty sure Souggy was referring to my blog piece since he commented about "a blog" he read and that mine was dated September 19, 2009 while his blog piece was on September 20, 2009. And what was interesting was that he never bothered to make clear who he was referring to. No link or names. I wonder why? Rather curious to try and hide it like that.
Secondly, there is nothing in my blog indicating I was "proud of that fact" that Deaf culture is dying because of cochlear implant and stem cells. If "Souggy" actually took the time to read what I wrote it was discussed in terms of a possibility, and not a fact that it will happen. In my blog piece there is nothing said or implied about being proud to see Deaf culture die out. It was irresponsible of "Souggy" to say such a thing. I presented a scenario that because of technology and the advancing biotechnnology could get to the point where it could heavily influence and impact the Deaf community in ways not seen with hearing aids and cochlear implants, and how it could affect mating preferences among deaf and hard of hearing people over time.
1 comment:
Ha ha, Mike. Looks like souggy locked out his blog to the public at large and limited to those who can sign in. Shows just how dishonest Souggy really is, I guess.
Keep it up. Enjoy reading your stuff.
TK
Post a Comment