"Not 'terp' enough" - when interpreters discriminate and demean lower ranking learners

This is something I hadn't considered or even thought it existed but apparently it does according to one person detailing the encounters at a sign language interpreter conference. It's when some ASL/sign language interpreters look down upon those not at their level of skill saying how they are not deserving to receive CEU points. Sort of like the old "you're not Deaf enough" kind of thing in an off skewed way.

My daughter needs to keep up her skills as a terp so she went to a convention. I took the opportunity and went with. Looked forward to having a good time and did and learned a lot.

Met people there from top scale terps to students to be. Some retained their professional persona at all times, others were kick-back and T shirted. My daughter forced me into a sports jacket, slacks and tie. Some signers made me dizzy and others were so unskilled they did not know the difference between "late" and "later." Bought a couple of DVD's on ASL.

Many arrived as early as possible, stayed as long as they could to get as much as possible, and darted to the next conference room. Those typically were dressed more relaxed. Those who dressed professionally tended to arrive on time and leave shortly after they received confirmation they had attended the class.

Confirmation consisted of a small bar code pasted next to the class you had attended during that time frame. Everyone ran up after class and got one and so did I.

A significant number made it plain, they were there for the bar code. They arrived at the last possible moment and left as soon as they got one. A couple even made it clear in the foyer they were taking the classes easiest for themselves. Seen as there was no test and you got a bar code whether you challenged yourself or not I found this particularly odd.

It was from this group the complaints came.

The argument was, "We are here to get CEU's so we can maintain our standing as terps and maintain our payscale." Or, "We are here so we can upgrade our payscale and charge more for our services." Continuing with, "Students should not be allowed bar codes even to show they attended these classes -- because we have put in our time, students have not, and it is how we earn our money."

I felt this was pretty petty as students cannot get CEU's whether they have the bar code or not. All it can do for them is show they attended. And that is all they have to show they did.

When I pointed out I wanted my little bar code too even though I am not a "terp in training" I was given the info that I was just a visitor and didn't even belong there in the first place.

I went ahead and got my bar codes any way. All told the trip, hotel, and convention fees cost me over $1,500. I felt I deserved something to show I had been in attendance.

And it is nice to know there is one more place in the world I do not belong.

Here I thought I'd used them all up already.

CEU stands for Continuing Education Units or learning points in case you're wondering. But note the bolded portion in the above. That convention was open to anyone and no prerequisite was required for attendance or to get the coveted CEU points for attending one. That convention is by no means cheap and comes with a hefty price tag just to attend one.

Aside from the convention points of view, I could imagine that there are some snotty ASL interpreters out there with the attitude that they won't associate with those who are "not at their level" when it comes to ASL skill level. And that they wouldn't dare associate themselves with. I wonder if it is a common attitude in the world of certified ASL/Sign Language interpreters? And they have nothing to do anything or anyone as long as they get their money? Is it really that bad out there? Does this "not 'terp' enough" exist at all? Have some them become so corrupted with their $35, $50, $70, $100 dollars an hour fees?

This brings up another question. Do the high fees set the stage to discourage people from hiring expensive interpreters? One unknown person made this comment in a blog "Anonymous Deaf Law Student":

You can argue that requiring professionals to pay for interpreters will not lead to discrimination because of an oath all you want, but the fact is it will. I am a practicing attorney. Our office just handled its first deaf bankruptcy and now we are being charged with the interpreter’s bill. I can tell you, it will be the last deaf anything we do. I’m not saying we want to discriminate, I’m saying that we are running a business here and we are not seeing the profits we want from this last client. Not only was the case overall more difficult because of the communication problem, but now it is costing us extra in fees. So, we have a hundred different reasons not to take someone’s case, and now we have one more.

All the more reason to hope that technology in itself will one day help alleviate this problematic case of getting billed too much for interpreting services. We already saw what happened with the whole VRS mess. Greed has a way of doing that. Though it'd be great to have real time sign language recognition avatar-like interpeter that recognizes voice and sign language. That might be a awhile but with technology comes with creative solutions. It is a fact that private businesses are there to make money, not go out of business. Technology is the key to help level the playing field so that everybody benefits.