The Gallaudet University Global Warming Scare Video Library

I wonder how many Gallaudet students are actually checking out Gallaudet University's global warming scare video libary? Are students that gullible?

Focus The Nation- Global Warming The Spread of Infectious Disease - but the problem is that this isn't the case with pathogen carrying insects like mosquitoes. In fact there is a peer-reviewed article in Malaria Journal that questions the problems of stating that global warming will cause an increase in the spread of infectious diseases and that, for example, Malaria doesn't thrive only in tropical or warm areas.

Few people are aware that it is less than forty years since the final eradication of malaria in Europe and the United States. Indeed, the disease was common in the period from the 16th to 18th centuries that climatologists term the Little Ice Age [33], and data from burial records around the Thames estuary reveal that mortality in "marsh parishes" of England was comparable to that in areas of transmission in sub-Saharan Africa today [40,41].

Until the mid-19th century, the northern limit of transmission was roughly defined by the present 15°C July isotherm. Denmark and parts of Sweden suffered devastating epidemics until the 1860s. Incidence diminished thereafter and the disease had essentially disappeared around the turn of the 20th Century. The same was true in Finland, except for a brief recrudescence in 1941, during the Russo-Finnish war. Figure 1 shows the distribution of malaria cases in Norway between 1860 and 1920. In England, there was a gradual decrease in transmission until the 1880s, after which it dropped precipitously and became relatively rare, except in a short period following World War I. In Germany, transmission also diminished rapidly. After World War I it was mainly confined to a few marshy localities [36].

Too bad that Gallaudet University won't have the information I've provided available for students to read and make up their own mind instead.

Or how about this global warming scare video called, "Focus The Nation : Habitat, Species, and Global Warmning" where it uses scary satellite pictures of the extent of our North pole sea ice "disappearing" comparing a 1979 satellite photo to that of 2007 of the same month. Never mind the fact that satellite photos began in 1978 and that we have only 32 years worth of data and not hundreds of years or thousand of years of data to compare it with.

Here's a time lapse of North Pole sea ice extent from 1978 to 2009. And compare that to Gallaudet University's scare video.




Photos seen below taken from Gallaudet University's scary before and after video results on lowest sea ice extent ending at in the month of September in 1979 and 2007.





Scary, huh? But since 2007 onward the sea ice extent has been gaining grounds since if you look at a sea ice extent graph seen below which is updated daily and can be found here. Too bad that Gallaudet students weren't aware of the limited data extending back barely 30 years which doesn't prove anything about global warming. Must be the nice brainwashing campus atmosphere? After all these years, not a single, solitary Gallaudet student or even a professor ever challenged my assertions that this whole global warming theory (yes, a theory and not a fact) is but a farce and a global wide hoax heaped upon unsuspecting and clueless people. But, shhhh, don't let Gallaudet University and their students know that.

Are deaf people more prone to believe in global warming claims?

I couldn't help but think about this question. Are deaf people more prone or likely to believe in the global warming claim (as caused by man) when compared to hearing people? It'd be an interesting data to gather and collect but it would also mean a lot of time involved to come to this conclusion. Although I have formed my own "conclusion" if you don't mind. It's based on what I've read so far and how people responded to this anthropogenic global warming theory claiming that CO2 is the major culprit on causing Earth to warm up (btw, we haven't warmed up in over 11 years) despite the fact that the Earth's climate system is incredibly complex that is coupled closely with our ocean, the land, the sun and even cosmic rays. What I've seen and read so far it appears that Deaf people in general have a much greater tendency to believe in such a global warming claim than hearing people. Of course, I could be wrong since it's an observation of mine over many years. Though please note a recent poll on global warming concerns by people was shown to be dead last in 20th place with economy, jobs, and terrorism as the top 3 concerns. If impending doom is so great I'm sure global warming concerns would be a the top. But it's not.

Gallaudet University has been pushing this global warming theory (yes, it is a theory and not a fact, folks) for several years on campus to gullible students. Mind the fact that having clean water, air and land, and be good environmental stewards at the regional and local scale is what we all want but to mix it up with the global warming theory confuses the issue and message. And while I'm at it at I have not seen any evidence of Gallaudet University of ever setting up a forum debate between those who believe in the theory to those who do not or are very skepetic. I've addressed this students and Gallaudet question before a few years back in this blog but this time my question is bit different.

First off, one of the good reasons as why people shouldn't buy into this global warming theory is the continual use of fear on people who don't know any better about science. This is currently being done at a global scale in the effort to push this global warming theory. That alone should ring plenty of warning bells. Several clues were already apparent such as polar bears drowning because of lack of sea ice (not true since polar bears can swim for many miles for hours), fearful video ads (such as this little girl seen clutching a stuffed polar bear toy as sea water rushes in with her clinging to life on tree limb), rising sea water to hundreds of feet (like on Al Gore's book cover where sea water ate away many states shoreline even far back into the North Georgian mountains and with Cuba gone, too, even though they have mountains over 6,000 ft high), more frequent and intense hurricanes (already debunked), Himalayan glaciers retreating quickly with such unprecendency (quite false and unproven much to IPCC embarrassment and ineptitude), rising temperature (we've been warming up ever since the last ice age some 13,000 years ago but funnily enough we've been static for the last 11 years or so), and so on. When you see scare tactics being used then it's a warning sign that something doesn't pass the smell test.

Gallaudet Green is guilty of doing this as well.

Dear Student Organizations,

The Green Gallaudet Environmental Organization serves an emerging movement of globally conscious citizens dedicated to improving the condition of our earth. The earth is facing an imminent catastrophic ecological collapse if human civilization continues on its current course.

Imminent catastrophic ecological collapse? That dire warning reminds me of that weird guy on a city corner street holding a sign that says, "The end is near, repent!" Or maybe that would be Obama doing that? Exactly when will this happen? How imminent are we talking about? Years? Decades? Centuries? A few hundred thousand years from now? Can you, Gallaudet Green, explain exactly how this "ecological collapse" will occur? Or do you not have the proper science background and knowledge to spew that nonsense in the first place? I'd have more concerns over an all out nuclear or biological warfare than global warming or for that matter...cooling.

But back to my original question. Are Deaf people more prone to be influenced by this global warming claim (as caused by man)? Or is this related to their lack of understanding in the field of science? Or even critical thinking skills? Does Gallaudet University teach critical thinking skills when it comes to climate and Earth science? Or has Gallaudet University, the students, teachers and such allow themselves to be influenced by a climate theory that cannot even be validated out in the field?

Again, when scare tactics are used globally and scientists who have their hands in the cookie jars of government grants on global warming call names on other people like "deniers" are warning signals that something is wrong here. Something is fishy. People and leaders have been lying to the public for over a decade on this global warming claim.

Shame on them. Shame on Gallaudet University. Shame on those who think it's better to call people names than to debate on the merit of scientific knowledge.