Will Lefty Loonie Liberals Get Eggs on Their Faces over Rove's Case?

It just gets funnier by the minute. These Liberals love to presume a guilty charge rather than innocence among any Republicans who are presumably charged with a "crime" in a probe investigation when in fact Karl Rove is not the target of the probe investigation according to Plamegate special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald. Liberals do not allow the probe to complete its investigation to uncover where the leak had originally occurred. In this case, it'd be the Karl "Evil" Rove who they say exposed Valeria Plame's identity when it was Novak all along, or so it seems.

Chief presidential adviser Karl Rove testified to a grand jury that he talked with two journalists before they divulged the identity of an undercover CIA officer but that he originally learned about the operative from the news media and not government sources, according to a person briefed on the testimony.

The person, who works in the legal profession and spoke only on condition of anonymity because of grand jury secrecy, told The Associated Press that Rove testified last year that he remembers specifically being told by columnist Robert Novak that Valerie Plame, the wife of a harsh Iraq war critic, worked for the CIA.

Isn't that interesting? And yet Democrats want to buddy up with Wilson the liar thinking he's the golden boy in helping to oust Karl "Evil" Rove the mastermind in helping President Bush from the Administration?

Hey, you Liberal wackos, ready to concede defeat once this is cleared by the probe investigation? Ready to apologize for your behaviors?

Now, why would I expect that? They'll just claim that Karl Rove was the mastermind behind all this in his evil, diabolical effort to make Liberals look like fools.

Actually, it's not that. It's just that Liberals always make fools of themselves. They'll look in the mirror and blame the mirror for their appearances. That's how many of them react nowadays.