Of course, McCaskill hasn't been fired. Never happened. Yet. Just a scenario I painted.
Now, should that scenario happen then doing so would probably become a very expensive proposition for the university. An expensive lawsuit could hurt their bottom line, perhaps their future as a college and a very possible reality that president Hurwitz could go to jail for firing McCaskill but that's a fuzzy line to that possibility. There is a Washington D.C. law that prevents an employer from firing an employee for signing a petition, for example, that an employer doesn't like as way to bully employees into submission.
Under the D.C. Code, it is a criminal violation for “[a]ny person who … by threats or intimidation, interferes with, or attempts to interfere with, the right of any qualified registered elector to sign or not to sign any initiative, referendum, or recall petition.” The sentence for violating the provision can be up to a $10,000 fine and a year in prison.Remember, folks. McCaskill signed a petition to allow a referendum for Maryland residents an alternative option to vote against the state's Civil Marriage Protection Act . She is absolutely entitled to sign a petition for a referendum. She didn't write an op-ed piece to the editor demanding that gay couples should not be allowed to marry. She did not carry signs on street corners demanding that natural marriage ought to be the rule of law. And so on. She exercised her civil rights to sign for a referendum. But, boy, somebody sure had plenty of time on their hands and a serious axe to grind in the effort to find McCaskill's name through 110,000 other names and addresses which was probably based on a tip received and decided to go hunting.
…Because a Maryland law — and not a D.C. law — is at issue in the referendum, however, the D.C. Code’s criminal provision is not directly implicated. But, it could indirectly apply to McCaskill’s suspension through a civil lawsuit in which she seeks money or reinstatement.
I'm sure president Hurwitz and Gallaudet University's administrators are taking their time with their lawyers if firing her would be such a smart move or not. Would it be worth it? A safe bet?
Family Research Council has already set up a petition drive to help re-instate Dr. Angela McCaskill. So far there has been 16,654 responses on joining the petition drive. Will it work?
Meh. We'll see. More drama down the road I suppose.

4 comments:
DC permits at will firing. She would have no grounds to sue.
She has every reasons and grounds to sue. Sorry. Using their playbook, she could sue because of racism in the system. Whatever the reason she or her lawyer's think on the grounds for suing they will go with that. Only question is that will she sue if Hurwitz fires her or place her elsewhere. The one way that could possibly help save face for Hurwitz is to over a generous retirement compensation package rather than wage an expensive legal campaign.
It seems those who are familiar with laws regarding this situation is saying Gallaudet can be sued easily. So, anonymous, your statement is based on what? You have cites to back up what you said, anonymous of 5:40 AM?
I remember she was upset that someone at Gallaudet said that someone get murdrered because he was gay during JK time. She is always supporting for gays.
Gallaudet made a big mistake to fire her because the consonuel(sp) law said that it is adminstrative fault 83%. That mens adminstration has to be very careful hiring people. If they do not do good job hiring a person and then fires that person, then it is adminstration's completely fault.
Post a Comment