It was a sad day to witness the beginning on the calling of deaf/hh people as "hoodless." I warned people in my blog 5 years ago about the dangers of judging people for what they "have" or "don't have" when it comes to "deafhood." Which was why many of us made the point of saying "Deafhood? No thanks" and joined the DNT Facebook for that very reason. We continue on with own our unique but deeply personal journey in life as people with hearing loss and how we identify ourselves as and whatever makes you happy. We recognize the value of diversity, and that we support and respect all forms of communication and language. We say "no thanks" to "deafhood" because we recognized right away it would lead to acts of discrimination and segregation. It has simply become a glorified ideology specifically and mainly for culturally deaf people, and nothing more. That's the problem. It's not really about for anybody with hearing loss. There's a certain sine qua non when it comes to "deafhood," believe it or not. We don't presume who has "deafhood" and who doesn't, and that was the trap we recognized at the very beginning. We prefer to move forward and not backward and instead would rather follow ICED recommendation to accept and respect all forms of communication and language whether combined or used alone be it PSE, ASL, SEE, cued speech, oral-aural, oral, the use of hearing aids and cochlear implants to help with the communication, or plainly just do without them. We have respected those differences since day one even before ICED came out with their own recommendation.
I'm sad to say this but I continue to be correct on this.
I will continue to say "no thanks" and just simply accept you as for who you are, and not about what you are. That's a simple recipe for happiness.
9 comments:
It's pathetic. They don't seem living in a solid foundation with their beliefs. They seem don't understand the rules so what becomes of them? Are they trying to become a human superiority than others like the Nazi days? They are acting like one.
Russell
It was surreal. Even more so of a fodder and I am not gonna apologize for finding the whole thing funny.
At the same time it is sad that it is happening.
Funny how folks didn't know who used that term 'hoodless' and proceeded to disregard that person as being 'clueless' about deafhood. Geesh.
We ought to keep things simple and quit with the labels. All the labels only create chaos.
If we all adopt ICES's Statement of Principle, the deaf community online wouldn't be such a mess.
meep!..."hoodless", there goes another label.
Ann_C
I don't have my Facebook account. Sorry to say that I don't like using the Facebook.
Could you possible to edit that ignorant statement from the Deafhood Discussion and paste it right here? I'd like to read that ignorant statement.
Thanks --
White Ghost
I save it when it had about 80 comments, and last I checked there was 90 comments but it is now gone. They removed it.
I'll send it to ya using your email that is on my blog if it is okay with you.
'Hoodless In Seattle' coming to a cinema near you...
Hey, what's the link for "hoodless"? You must prove who said that.
How do you define Deafhood?
I don't. Because a journey is already a deeply personal one that cannot be defined. There is no need for a definition. It's simply a feel good word.
Post a Comment