Saturday, April 13, 2013

Bullying Inside the Deaf/HOH Community Rehashed

It's sad whenever (cyber)bullying occurs by deaf/hh bullies in the deaf/hh community whether bullies know sign language or not over deafness-related issues or that the target has a communication preference different from others as a reason for the attack. Recently an unfortunate circumstance occurred a few days ago in a Facebook forum that got out of control between two adults with one being the obvious aggressor. Equally unfortunate was that the author of the Bullying Inside the Deaf/HOH Community article used the situation by making unfounded assertions.  The admin of this Deaf/HH Blogs FB group, yours truly, had already rectified the situation as already explained yesterday, April 10th, under Aaron's post that began on March 27, 2013 (scroll down until you see Aaron's March 27 posting).
If you click on "members" in the upper right part of the FB you can see who currently are members. The said person is no longer a member since yesterday. It is understandable that Sveta is upset with what has happened. One thread was already removed yesterday. I already explained on the day of the incident that I will need to sit down and read what was going on before deciding what I needed to do since I've been busy away from home. People here do have the option to not respond to an offensive post. People are mature enough to recognize when to stop and let the admin handle it should it get out of hand. This is a low volume FB group and it just so happens personality and conviction clashed.

I purposely let the Aaron thread alone so others can see exactly what had happened and how perspectives, feelings, and beliefs can vary widely even in the deaf/hh community regarding communication access and deafness-related issues. I have made my points clear more than a few times that any hearing loss organization should be prepared to provide the proper communication access when requested by deaf or hard of hearing individuals. Not doing so make them a hypocrite organization. There is a difference when one tries to accommodate vs those who do not try at all and flat out refuse such service.

This is also a reminder that even those in the deaf/hh community (non-signers) still need to be educated on the value of communication access and the need to help others feel accepted in the community. And conversely, some in the culturally deaf community need to be educated as well.
The discussion did stop on March 28 with Aaron's initial post that began on March 27th. However, the discussion was picked up again on April 10th, Wednesday, almost two weeks later after it stopped and it all went downhill quickly after that. I addressed the incident on April 12, Friday coming off of a week long multiple projects that required my attention. I can't always hover around each and every posts that get submitted and follow each every comments made. There's a reason why you turn off your FB apps on your phone.  In this situation some give and take are needed as well maintaining proper sensibilities.

The bickering made worse when ad hominem attacks were used instead of using cogent arguments to make the case.  Feelings ran high, people made rash decisions and rash words. But because emotion was running high so soon after that incident the author of Bullying Inside the Deaf/HOH Community who felt victimized by the whole incident, and I don't blame her, decided to use my name to skew the situation unfairly.

Bullying inside the deaf/hh community, especially in the culturally deaf community, isn't new. It has been going on for years. I've written many topics on cyber/bullying in my blog (see http://tinyurl.com/d99o7d4 ) and I have been a target myself many times because of my views and opinions. I don't see myself as a victim but rather that some people still need to be educated. That includes the Deaf community, deaf community, hard of hearing community and the hearing community.

And that, folks, is in a nutshell.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

I had specific examples of what you had done and said, and exposing the inherent hypocrisy of what you were saying in your blog. That's bullying? COME ON! GET REAL!

Mike said...

Who is this?

There were no hypocrisy on my end. I've laid out what happened and why. Nowhere did I say what you did was bullying (assuming you're the person I'm thinking of).

Candy said...

There are some things that each of us can do when we have grievances regarding anyone within a Facebook page or group, we need to give the admin time to respond. This person, a female individual demanded that this rude male be removed, did not wait for the admin to respond or give this admin time to review what happened.

I think you did what you could, you were not available and when you were made known of what was happening, you needed time to review what was said.

You removed the aggressor, but the person that was upset decided to remove herself without waiting for you to respond and/or to take action.

I think it is silly for anyone to expect things to happen pronto. As if your life is all about admin that page. haha You do not sit in front of your computer 24/7 and admin that page, do you? ;)

At least you took care of that rude guy (I'm assuming you were the one that removed him, correct?). Hopefully that female will see this and go back to that deaf/hh blog page as I'm sure she can contribute her blogs for all of us to read.

It seems like she misunderstood you big time. It happens. *shrug*

Mike said...

Yes, things do happen sometimes beyond my control. I am not a babysitter 24/7. In fact I expect members in deaf/hh blogs to be mature about posting their comments. And they need to remember that ad hominem attacks do not make an argument. She misunderstood the whole situation and unreasonably expected quick resolution. I did the best I could under MY situation at the time. I expected better from them in the first place.