Tuesday, December 28, 2004

When Some Liberals Refuse to Think First about Aids to Tsunami Victims

There is a problem among some Liberals, Europeans, United Nation worshippers and people who insist on thinking with their foot in their mouth. Even among some Deaf militants, too, who want to lump the initial $15 million relief aid to the tsunami victims (which billions more dollars will come out of the United States government) as “a typical Republican administration” response. This couldn’t be further from the truth.

Now, this is a natural disaster event that took place only but two days ago. The momentum will gather in giving more aid to the countries, mostly Muslims, affected by the 15 to 30 foot high tsunami killer waves. This has always been the case for the United States, even during the Clinton (gasp!), Carter, and JFK (no, not John F. Kerry, he lost, remember?) administrations to give aid and comfort to countries in times of need.



The chief of U.S. Agency for International Development, which distributes foreign aid, was quick to point out Tuesday that foreign assistance for development and emergency relief rose from $10 billion in President Clinton's last year ( in office) to $24 billion under President Bush in 2003. Secretary of State Colin Powell said assistance for this week's earthquake and tsunamis alone will eventually exceed $1 billion.

And yet, we will need permission to get more money and this will require more time to ask Congress to allocate monies for this emergency need. How ironic when some Liberals make the claim of "stinginess" when they should be looking at Clinton's administration. If some of the Democrats insist on putting their feet in their mouths, be my guest.

The “stingy” comment came from Jan Egeland, a Norwegian U.N. Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs, who suggested that the United States and other Western nations were being "stingy" with relief funds, saying there would be more available if taxes were raised.




"The United States, at the president's direction, will be a leading partner in one of the most significant relief, rescue and recovery challenges that the world has ever known," said White House deputy press secretary Trent Duffy. But U.N. Undersecretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Jan Egeland suggested that the United States and other Western nations were being "stingy" with relief funds, saying there would be more available if taxes were raised.

"It is beyond me why are we so stingy, really," the Norwegian-born U.N. official told reporters. "Christmas time should remind many Western countries at least, [of] how rich we have become."

"There are several donors who are less generous than before in a growing world economy," he said, adding that politicians in the United States and Europe "believe that they are really burdening the taxpayers too much, and the taxpayers want to give less. It's not true. They want to give more."


But even now, Jan Egeland, is desperately back-peddling his prior comments:




Egeland said on Tuesday, however, that his remarks had been misinterpreted. "It has nothing to do with any particular country or any particular disaster," he told reporters.

How typical of some of these Euro-trash who like nothing better than to berate other countries on what they should or should not do with their monies when it comes to helping other countries in times of emergency need. And when they get caught in the cross-fire they back peddle saying they never meant it that way.

Even before the announcement of the $15 million dollar installment (which means more will come and has increased to $35 million to date, and growing) was made Colin Powell ordered a dozen C-130 planes from the Pacific Command which are now hauling in food, water, blankets, emergency shelter and other relief supplies. The Thailand government has offered the United States a base to use as a regional support center in the recovery effort for those planes. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is sending a 21-member disaster-relief team to the region to help organize relief efforts. Also, the Pentagon ordered the Navy aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, which had been in port at Hong Kong, to sail for the stricken area to provide assistance. A five-ship fleet headed by the amphibious assault ship USS Bonhomme Richard will skip a port call in Guam to sail for the region. So much for a “stingy” United States government, which is just beginning on their third day of humanitarian aid of epic proportion in the tsunami crisis.

As always, any initial emergency response will be a bit chaotic while relief organizations and government scramble to assess needs and deploy resources. If planning calls for significant food aid, the United States will need to scramble because of other prior crisis’s in Sudan, West Africa and other areas hit by drought and fighting. But the tsunami killer waves crisis will undoubtedly produce more deaths through diseases such as cholera, malaria, and diarrhea due to unsanitary waters, fecal matters, dead rodents, and rotting bodies.

In an interview on NBC's "Today," Powell said Tuesday:

"Clearly, the United States will be a major contributor to this international effort. And, yes, it will run into the billions of dollars."


Anyone who has enough brain power can figure out that by sending out aircraft carriers, large cargo planes and ships loaded with supplies, thousands of personnel help, armed military forces, expertise and the likes will go into the billions…easily. Lt. Col Bill Bigalow, a spokesman for the U.S. Pacific Command put it quite succinctly that



"It is still very much an emerging crisis, and the important aspect is to take the finite amount of resources we have and apply them where they can best be allocated."

It’s all about making efficient use of money, time and resources. Not about throwing money around haphazardly because time is of essence! It must be done with quick planning. Without proper planning more needless deaths can arise through carelessness and greed such as the United Nations’ Oil for Food scandal causing hundred of thousands of Iraqis deaths, most of them children, when medicine, food, and clean water could have saved them over several years time while under Saddam’s rule and while the United Nation looked the other way as they collected the kickbacks and bribes. If you want to condemn an organized body, be it that of the United Nations.

Not only will the U.S. Government contribute (per your tax dollars at work) also private and philanthropic organizations will gather their wills to collect monies, clothing, food, medicine, and even tents. Such important organizations jumping in are the Salvation Army, Network for Good, and Feed the Children responding to the biggest tsunami disaster in recent memory.


More of these types of organizations, many of them Christian organizations, will grow since the United States is a nation about giving and helping those who are in need. We want to give because that is our nature, unlike the United Nations and other countries. And yet the United States is the biggest contributor already! What happened to Saudi Arabia? Should not they be the biggest contributor? With all that profits from oil they ought to be the most overly concerned and most generous contributor as a Muslim country. Most of the victims are from Muslim countries. Saudi Arabia pledged $10 million cash and assistance. Talk about irony here.

What these other countries taking pride of their government foreign aid contribution, notably Norway at .92 percent of the GNP (being the higest of all countries while U.S. is near the bottom), do not consider other contributions such as philanthropic and private organizations in the United States as being one of the biggest (if not the biggest) in the world when it comes to dollars spent of foreign aids. The amount spent is stagering and the usual rule of thumb is more than three times what the U.S. government spends.


Americans privately give at least $34 billion overseas -- more than three times U.S. official foreign aid of $10 billion (2001 figure):

International giving by U.S. foundations totals $1.5 billion per year

Charitable giving by U.S. businesses now comes to at least $2.8 billion annually

American NGOs gave over $6.6 billion in grants, goods and volunteers.

Religious overseas ministries contribute $3.4 billion, including health care, literacy training, relief and development.

$1.3 billion by U.S. colleges are given in scholarships to foreign students

Personal remittances from the U.S. to developing countries came to $18 billion in 2000

But looking at the U.S. and Foreign Aid link you will note the irony of some of the figures (and remarks like Kofi Annan's) given out when you think about all what the United States has done over the years when it comes to international aid...private and government. And the biggest irony came from our former President Jimmy Carter who remarked:

“We are the stingiest nation of all,” former President Jimmy Carter said recently in an address at Principia College in Elsah, Ill. Dec 29, 1999.

There’s more to it than dumping monies on a nation in need. There are other resources that are much more valuable than just money alone. Money alone cannot take the place of human dignity and respect. We must remember that as a nation that cares we must help our neighbors in times of need. Sadly, there are those who want nothing more than to falsely accuse the United States just for the sake to make political (but worthless) points. A good example of this can be seen how an overly-zealous person bent on making political points so soon after a disaster which the United States government and other private groups are still organizing and planning:



They were quick enough to spend billions of dollars on the War on Iraq, terrorism but only $15 million for the devastated places?

Again, again and again -- what a typical Republican administration.



The United States will always be there to help countries in times of need, even if it means being back-stabbed by politically driven and jealous idiots here and abroad knowing that an emerging crisis takes time to organize, collect and dispatch the needed resources to the affected areas.

Please visit your favorite charity or philanthropic organization to help the tsunami victims by donating money, time or supplies. Time is of essence. My thoughts and prayers go to the tsunami victims.




19 comments:

Ridor said...

First impressions are important.

USA failed.

One American looked for 3 hours to find the consulate only to find them in VIP Lounge. While many nations set up the booths in open view.

Says a lot.

R-

Mike said...

A booth with no address in the middle of all the chaos and destroyed buildings while people running around still looking for their loved ones? Now, this disaster occurred in several countries...not in one tiny area, lest you forget. And yet it was the American Red Cross in Asia that responded first to the scene almost imediately. The government comes in next when it comes to international aid.

"International Red Cross and Red Crescent societies in south Asia have begun to mobilize staff and volunteers to affected areas to assist with the immediate needs. Emergency assessment and first-aid teams have already reached some of the affected areas.

“The situation is fluid, with so many people affected in so many areas of southeast Asia, and it is likely that relief teams there may need many different types of assistance in the coming days,” said Matthew Parry of the International Disaster Response Unit at the American Red Cross. "

http://www.redcross.org/article/0,1072,0_312_3879,00.html


In short, R, your assessment literally falls apart. So much for your penchant for anecdotal "evidences" of how USA failed. One American had a hard time finding the consulate amid the disaster and confusion is called a "USA failure"?

The only thing failed here is your logic of the situation. Might want to address the Clinton Administration's "stinginess" on International Aid while you're at it, which was twice less than that of Bush 2 when compared to 2003.

Ridor said...

Stop twisting with these phony factoids that you are having on your arguments.

Please read the article via the link on my blog. This is AMERICAN who experienced this and was ashamed of Americans being arrogant in the VIP Lounge, ordering them to pay for the pictures and passport whereas many people lost the ATM cards, passports et al.

Don't try to rationalize this, nothing is new with you -- you try to rationalize and simplify it. You were not there. Stop acting that it's all about Liberals.

It's not. It is MY opinion -- you dirty conservative p***k.

R-

Mike said...

Again, as I reiterate, it's nothing but anecdotal "evidence" of what occurred at one place in time. It is not representative of all US Consulates throughout Asia who are experiencing the same dilema. I don't see how >ONE<, supposedly so, incident makes USA a "failure." What a nice discombobulating logic there.

Local resources do what they can do at their best be that of the Thai govt, American/Crescent/International Red Cross or some other grassroots organizations.

Bush sent letters of condolence to Bangladesh, Thailand, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, India, Maldives and Mala several hours after the tsunamis took place. The letter was sent that Monday. The U.S. govt cannot act unless countries officially request help.

If you want to forgo logic for an opinion, be my guest.

Ridor said...

Typical response from delusional being who refused to see that there are flaws within our swift actions. We were too slow. Period.

We were swift in attacking nations but slow to aid.

You completely MISSED the whole point, anyway. You're stupid as always. Terrorism cannot be fought by force only. It has to be done with education and compassion for others to see what kind of people we are -- but no, we only attack fast, but slow in aid response.

Who cares about the "letters"!!!! Just show some actions where others can see how good we are. NO, you are just deluded fake American who claims to be a patriot.

R-
R-

Mike said...

Remember, the United States govt cannot act unless countries officially request help. This is why he sent those letters immediately to let them know that they can ask anytime and the U.S. government will move immediately. All Bush need is words from leaders impacted by the disaster. Even during the Clinton administration they had to abide by that protocol. The U.S. is the guest when it comes to helping a country in times of human disasters.

No point was missed. You missed it about the letters since it sends a signal to those countries that the United States is there to help. All Bush need is an official request from leaders of those countries affected by the disaster. Plus, you’re using >ONE< incident to justify your, ah, opinion to label the U.S.A. as a “failure” overlooking the fact that the U.S.A. (private and govt) is already helping the hundreds of thousands of victims of tsunamis, including American tourists. Such action by the U.S. Consulate as reported by CNN is unwarranted and an unfortunate incident but then again we don't have the full story.

This is only the beginning and without appreciating the massive logistical nightmare ahead of us, cooperation is the utmost importance. How fast is fast enough for you? Three hours after the event? Ten? Twelve? Twent four hours? Two days?


If you want to talk about our “swiftness” in attacking nations, such as Iraq, please realize that it took weeks and months of preparation just get the troops, ships, planes and equipments ready for Bush’ word (per Congressional approval) to attack Iraq. This tsunami disaster is unprecedented in recent human history and will require all of the countries their help. Saying “stingy” about western countries, without specifically addressing the U.S. (the Norwegian idiot, Jan Egeland, doesn’t fool anybody one whit) does not help the situation at all. Jan Egeland made himself a fool to say that when cooperation is most needed at this time, not divisiness. People who believe him is nothing but an utter fool and an U.N. butt-kissing worshipper. That’s pretty unAmerican by my standards when the U.S. is noted for their immense generosities in the first place.

I’m as American as anybody when it comes to Patriotism. I’m comfortable for who I am and will not be even bothered nor intimidated by your petulent words. Why should I be? At least I honor those who help protect the United States compared to those Liberal Michael Moore anti-American weenie worshippers. I salute, wave or shake hands whenever I see a veteran, and I pay my respect to dead soldiers at cemetaries.

God Bless the U.S.A. and the Armed Forces! Semper Fi!

Ridor said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Mike said...

R, you know the rules.

And hey, good thing I said >some< Liberals do these sorts of things. There are some good Liberals and Democrats out there. I certainly don't wish death on any of them nor do I celebrate their deaths like you do. Macabre is all I can say. And yet you want to brush a broad stroke by saying "a typical Republican administration" comment. Do us a favor, go and enjoy your weenie roast like a good boy scout, and I'll continue make references to any links that I deem fit (or unfit for that matter) for my blogsite. Too bad you want to complain instead of putting out links to charitable organizations to help those tsunamis victims. Two blogs in a row of yours with nary a comment about helping the victims by providing a link or two (or three). Instead, you want complain like a 4 year old. No, make that a 3 year old and throw in a floor-busting temper tantrums as a bonus. You've an agenda, and it's certainly not about helping people in times of disasters.

Oh, and this is just my opinion. Take it with a grain of salt.

Ridor said...

Either way, I am amused that you continued to snoop in my blogsite. Get a life. I don't like you. I don't like your ideas. I don't like what kind of person you are. I don't like you at all!

You lack the creativity. You had to read my blogsite in order to say something because you lack your own imagination. You had to check and use my blogsite as a forum to argue in your blogsite.

To me, it is tasteless.

Amy, Amy. Quite the contrary, it is YOU. You love to harass me by emails and using different pseudonym names -- childish tactics -- to attack me repeatedly.

Amy, you are forbidden to comment on my blogsite. I got a lot of emails from people who were happy that I lambasted and blocked you and Jeff from commenting on my blogsite.

R-

Mike said...

And the American tourist who had an "appalling" experience with the U.S. Consulate?

Good ol' CNN helped clarify what happened:

In an e-mailed response from the State Department, the chief of American Citizen Services said the embassy usually meets and greets every flight personally, but acknowledged there had been confusion the first night in setting up the operation.

Still, "anyone needing assistance is guided to our office in the VIP hall, which is the space allocated to us by the airport authority," the e-mail said.

Typically, anyone needing a passport is directed to go to the embassy, it added.

"If people have no funds to get to the embassy, they are offered a $100 emergency loan on the spot," the e-mail said.

Because of the emergency, the embassy has been issuing no-fee emergency passports since the tsunami hit, it said.

But the photo printer was working only sporadically on the day in question, so its use was reserved for those truly in need; others were asked to walk a building away to get their pictures taken, it said.

"Basically, if you had a decent supply of cash, you were asked to go get photos made so we could try to save the camera for desperate cases."

Mike said...

R, Amy is very much welcomed to make comments on my blogsite. If it concerns you, tough. Grow some hair for a change. Then again, you're welcomed to make comments on my blogsite, too.

However, temper tantrums and whinnings I do not take. Take note of Amy's "Official Democrat Seal" on her blogsite. Exactly.

Ridor said...

Make your OWN issues, don't come to my blog and try to discuss something from my blog. Be creative, for god's sake. Oops, you can't! Republicans cannot! Conservatives cannot! Christians cannot! They only whine, criticize, lie and pout all the time.

As for Amy, McConnell, how do you feel if someone has been harassing you via emails using different names? That is Amy. Childish for a mother of two strange kids.

R-

Mike said...

I am a lot more creative than you'd ever wish. You're just seeing a sliver of me. If I note any discrepancy regarding an issue I want to address, I'll do it my way. My blogsite is my own personal creation to disseminate my creative thinking and political discourse for the world to see. I do what I wish. My responsibility. Not you. Not her. Not him. But me. Tell me what to do and I'll show what an American bird looks like. You have a problem? Again, tough guano. Like I said, grow some hair for a change. Don't even read my blogsite. Even if your buddies tap you on the shoulder saying that I've made another reference to your site. Resist the tempt..ta....tion....not...to...looooook! Otherwise, stop the whinning. Be a, er, man for a change.

Whether a blogsite is boring or not, I keep it to myself. Keeps people guessing. Each blogsite has it own unique style that suits to different tastes. I'm not here to please everyone. Totally impossible. Please, understand that just for once.

Mike said...

Et tu brute? Speaking of creativity, I'm not the one who's whinning all the time on every imaginable subject. But that's you. Skedaddle for now. ;p

Ridor said...

Is that the best you can do?

Pitiful character. Do us a favor. Be reclusive and remain in your little world in New Mexico. That way, everyone wins! SYL.

R-

Ridor said...

I'm much more man than you will be -- I can say things in your face. I can say the word while you have to say "American bird".

So lame.

R-

Mike said...

Just because I'm in NM makes me reclusive? How little do you know. Now, run off and be a good littel boy scout and behave.

Ridor said...

You lost the whole argument with NYTimes Editorial refuting your arguments. Read and weep, loser.

R-

P.S. Who wants to be a boy scout? I don't.

Mike said...

NYTimes? Uh, yeah. Sure. Skeedaddle and be a nice little boy. Ok?