Combat with Grizzly Bear

A statue of two Indians fighting a mother grizzly bear in her effort to protect her two cubs was created by Douglas Tilden, a world renowned deaf sculpture, stands at the California School for the Deaf in Fremont, California.  The sculpture is called "The Bear Hunt."  It is also known as "Combat with Grizzly Bear" as explained by Jack Gannon.

Born May 1, 1860 Douglas Tilden lost his hearing at the age of 4 due to Scarlet Fever. Two years later his parents enrolled Douglas at the California School for the Deaf at UC Berkeley. He became an honor student and graduated from the school in 1879 at the age of 19. He soon accepted a teaching position CSD where he stayed there for eight years. It was during the summer vacations his artistic talents began to flourish.

Summer vacations were spent studying drawing and painting. In the summer of 1883, he discovered the joys of sculpture. He returned to teaching in the fall but continued making models in his leisure time. He dreamed of studying in Paris, then the mecca of most would-be sculptors. His clay model Tired Wrestler, a young, athletic, male nude figure, impressed the Board of Trustees of the California School for the Deaf enough that they gave him a loan of five hundred dollars for study in New York. In 1887, he resigned his teaching post and left California. 

Thanks to a grant of $600 per year from the Durham Fund, administered by the California School for the Deaf, Douglas embarked for Paris in May 1888. After visiting the Salon des Artistes Français on the Champs-Elysees, he went to work on the Baseball Player. With his unorthodox, purely American motifs, Tilden was the first California-born sculptor to win recognition outside of the U.S. by being accepted in the Paris Salon in 1889, then again in 1890, 1891, 1892, and 1894.

 And thus Douglas began his career as an internationally known sculptor.

But another battle is brewing at CSD and that is the effort to get rid of "The Bear Hunt" sculpture on the CSD campus grounds stating that the statue is racist in nature "racist imagery" according to the latest online petition that began on June 28, 2012 calling for the removal of Tilden's statue:

We feel that while Tilden is indeed a respected Deaf artist in our community, he remains a white male from the 19th century and the sculpture still represents generations of dehumanizing violence towards Native American communities. Such depictions have no place at a school, particularly if a school aims to uphold principles of racial and ethnic justice.

Though “The Bear Hunt” has stood at the front of campus for years, this “branding” situation served as an opportunity for us activists to challenge our social consciousness in how we have perceived and now perceive this statue. How long has the statue stood in front of campus without being challenged? How long have some individuals’ misgivings about the statue were ignored? We are working on collaborating with Native American Deaf and Deaf People of Color organizations on this issue in order to mobilize community dialogue regarding the statue.

The petition failed to explain exactly how or why the statue is racist other than explaining that the sculptor is a white male who sculpted a statue depicting an ultimate battle and will to live between two Indians and a mother grizzly bear while trying to protect her two cubs .  Exactly how does the statue dehumanizes violence towards Native American communities? It doesn't. It's about survival.  Douglas Tilden explains about his "The Bear Hunt" statue:

In 1892, Tilden finished a huge monument, the Bear Hunt. He wrote, “My Indian and bear present a full front, both in so full a vigor that who wins must forever be a question in the spectator’s mind.” The Bear Hunt arrived at the California School for the Deaf in Berkeley in 1895 after being exhibited for several months at the Art Institute in Chicago. Both the school and the Bear Hunt are now located in Fremont.

In other words, while looking at the statue of a battle between beast and man makes you wonder, who will win the battle?  The Indians or the mother grizzly bear? What is the story behind the fight for survival? Did the Indians accidentally come across the mother Grizzly bear? Or got too close in the bear hunt? However, there is nothing racist about the "The Bear Hunt" sculpture showing two Indians battling to survive a mother grizzly attack while trying to protect her two young cubs. Hunting for bears was common. Indians hunted grizzly bears for food and other materials but at the same time they were revered and respected their fearsome strength, independence and power to the status of being a "spiritual god."

Many Indians feared the grizzly bear but still they hunted the large bears for food, clothing, and even jewelry. Claws were made into necklaces and often worn hanging from their waistband.  Because of the Indians' beliefs that the bear had some spiritual power, wearing a bear claw necklace would mean protection and good health to the Indian wearing it.

Today Indians still wear necklaces of grizzly bear claws but only a few are preserved from the 1800s in museums. One famous bear claw necklace can be viewed at the Peabody Museum at Harvard. Since bear claws were objects that Indians treasured, very few were obtained outside of the Indian tribes.

Shortly after the petition to have the statue removed (only 53 signatures so far) another petition came up to counter the petition for removal in the effort to keep the statue on the campus grounds of CSD.

CAD Bay Area Chapter president, David Prince, speaking... I disagree with DYUSA Bay Area Chapter to remove the Bear Hunt Statue (BHS) off the campus of the California School for the Deaf. The Bear Hunt statue is not a racist; it illustrates us to understand the visual history how the Indians fought against the nature. It demonstrates the visual education to everyone how it looks like in their time of struggle. It was like a battle in nature, Human versus Bear.

So far there are 357 signatures to keep the statue vs 53 signatures to get rid of it. A strong sign that common sense is prevailing.  I see no "racist imagery" in that statue other than a battle of survival between man and nature.  Violence is part of the game of survival in nature. This is all about using emotional gimmickry to play the Deaf political correctness game based on some vague and obscure reasonings. 

What is palpably ironic, at least to me, is that Douglas Tilden's own statue work is facing the possibility of being rejected by the students of CSD and perhaps the school itself. The irony comes from the fact that  he worked at the CSD for several years as a deaf teacher and later on in his life tried to go back to CSD to work as a teacher again but only to be rejected because at the time CSD  stopped hiring and employing deaf teachers.  Douglas Tilden is turning over in his grave seeing that his own work is once again facing rejection.  This Deaf political correctness has simply run amok with no clear thinking whatsoever using false emotional appeal.

Visual Communication

There are deaf/hh people I know who grew up with SEE with their parents learning the English visual language. I'd say those deaf kids were lucky to have parents willing to sign as part of the visual communication effort than to rely on audition alone (i.e. speaking/listening). The oral and aural route may be a difficult route to take even though many kids have fared well while others didn't and that signing would've been helpful.  It also could have easily been no signing (ie. SEE, ASL, PSE, manual alphabet, LOVE, etc) whatsoever with no visual form of communication (including CUED speech) and just rely on their hearing aids only and do the whole oral/aural gambit instead. But luckily for them a visual language (e.g. SEE) was used to communicate and thus a foundation was indeed built. It may or may not have been a solid foundation but at least a foundation nonetheless.

Many SEE kids who are now adults show their gratefulness for their parents' contribution on establishing a visual communication effort with them. It could've been a lot worse. It could've been no signing at all.  Although I noticed some adults who grew up with SEE developed a certain disdain towards their own upbringing by their parents on the SEE usage simply because their parents didn't use ASL in the first place. How droll. How about at least show some kind of gratitude instead of being a snotty person about the whole affair and stop with this misguided anger towards parents for providing SEE instead of ASL? Signing in SEE became a familiar affair for those growing up with English visual language and because of that it helped those make the transition over from SEE to PSE or to ASL in a much more familiar environment as opposed to deaf/hh people who have never signed in SEE, PSE or ASL at all.

Be thankful you were exposed very early to SEE which is visual form of the English language rather than having no visual language at all.

Just ...... stop whining about SEE.

Open Communication and Open Society

Caption This!

There's no big mystery about this when it comes to believing that an open communication regardless of the method used is key to help people with hearing loss feel comfortable and on equitable grounds with the rest of their hearing peers. There are millions of people who feel the same way as I do. There are a variety of niche areas of technologies and services today that provide the advantage to help people with their communication needs and access. Just because deaf and hard of hearing people who know sign language does not mean they will be able to understand completely what was said in an ASL performance any more than deaf and hard of hearing people with their hearing aids and cochlear implants will understand completely what was said in a spoken (speech) theater performance or movie. I am talking about the whole range of population of people with hearing loss in the United States numbering around 36 million people versus a certain but limited number of those who are deaf/hh and fluent in ASL (around 600,000).

Just because deaf and hard of people who are fluent or know sign language does not mean they prefer always a signed performance but also like to attend performances by hearing people such as music (rock, country, etc) band on stage with their lyrics, stage performances and just your everyday movie theater while providing captions.  Both communication access using open captioning and sign language interpreters offer the best of both worlds. 

Q.What about services for the deaf or those who are hearing disabled? What exactly is open captioning? 

A.Open captioning uses a portable LED screen set up orchestra right or left, by the proscenium. It’s rarely on stage because we don’t want to disturb the artistic look of the show. It faces a particular side of the orchestra where we have made tickets available to people with hearing disabilities. 

We also offer sign language interpretation, but it is of no help whatsoever to people who are not deaf. Where our department is growing is in providing open captioning because there’s such a demand for it. 

Far too many people who don’t hear well are not going to admit it. The benefit of open captioning is that it’s passive assistance. It’s there and you can refer to it or not. You don’t have to identify yourself as having hearing loss. That’s very appealing. 

People with hearing loss want to make use of any hearing they have. They will use assisted listening devices in conjunction with the open captioning so they can understand some or most of what is being said.

Open captioning should be available to all regardless of the situation. You just never know who in the audience will need one. The same goes for Gallaudet University theater shows such as their recent Hamlet performance that was done in ASL and that all of their performances were voiced under the direction of Dr. Lindsey Snyder. But no open captioning for those who are new or weak on sign language and those who can hear Snyder's voice but would need assist with captioning. An ironic twist and a cruel but blatant discrimination against deaf/hh students and people who are relatively new or weak on sign language. A sign that Gallaudet University continues to be a closed society when it comes to having an open communication policy. One can still be in favor of sign language in an open society that advocates open communication but the converse cannot be true of those who are unwittingly in a closed society.

Each year Gallaudet University host this Jump Start program (formerly known as New Signers Program) to help incoming first year and transfer students improve their sign language skills. For them it is easier to improve on their expressive signing than receptive signing. Just because they attended the Jump Start program does not make them experts on ASL or will be able to understand everything that's being signed on stage for example the recent Hamlet performances in April.  Many students are hard of hearing and can hear and understand a person speaking with his/her voice. Each person's receptive skills and understanding of the spoken word varies. Even after the first and second year at Gallaudet University does not mean students receptive skills will guarantee 100% understanding the signing of ASL such as ASL performances on stage. In fact, by not providing open captioning to the audience who fall between understanding some ASL to understanding some of the spoken word at a Hamlet play is violating ADA accommodation and Section 504 law.  Students should be encouraged to file grievances for this transgression at Gallaudet University.

II. Scope of Grievance

Any University student who believes that he or she has been subjected to discrimination on the basis of disability or has been denied access or accommodations required by law shall have the right to invoke this Grievance Procedure. In general, this Grievance Procedure is designed to address the following types of concerns:

1. Disagreements or denials regarding requested services, accommodations, or modifications to University practices or requirements; 
2. Alleged inaccessibility of a University program or activity;
3. Alleged harassment or discrimination on the basis of a disability; and
4. Any other alleged violations of the ADA and/or Section 504. 

According to Section 504, and since Gallaudet University is a recipient of federal financial assistance, a post secondary institution has an obligation under to ensure accessibility to students with disabilities, including those with hearing loss and the need for communication accessibility.

An important responsibility of the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) is to eliminate discrimination on the basis of disability against students with disabilities. OCR receives numerous complaints and inquiries in the area of elementary and secondary education involving Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (Section 504). Most of these concern identification of students who are protected by Section 504 and the means to obtain an appropriate education for such students.

Section 504 is a federal law designed to protect the rights of individuals with disabilities in programs and activities that receive Federal financial assistance from the U.S. Department of Education (ED). Section 504 provides: "No otherwise qualified individual with a disability in the United States . . . shall, solely by reason of her or his disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance . . . ."

OCR enforces Section 504 in programs and activities that receive Federal financial assistance from ED. Recipients of this Federal financial assistance include public school districts, institutions of higher education, and other state and local education agencies. The regulations implementing Section 504 in the context of educational institutions appear at 34 C.F.R. Part 104.

Services students should be able to request at Gallaudet University:

* American Sign Language Interpreter
* Signed English Interpreter (SEE-Signing Exact English or PSE-Pidgin Sign English)
* FM Systems and Conference Microphones
* Voice interpreter
* CART
* Remote Captioning
* Cued Speech Transiliterator
* I-Communicator
* Typewell/C-Print
* Professional or Volunteer Notetakers

Even though Gallaudet University obviously supports ASL many are calling for the exclusive use of ASL for all or "ASL at all times." That'd be if only the educational institution in question was a private educational institution that receives no federal funding then it wouldn't fall under the rules of Section 504.  But since Gallaudet University receives annual federal funding for as long as it has been opened it must abide by Section 504 laws.  Section 504 gives the power over to students who may request communication accessibility other than ASL or voice.

Gallaudet University once again violates ADA law and Section 504 for not providing an alternative communication access for  their signed ASL performances for students and people who still lack the necessary receptive skills to understand fully the signed ASL performances.  Gallaudet University continues to be the living and breathing conundrum for deaf/hh students new to the world of sign language and they are unable to even enjoy and understand signed performances. Gallaudet University was willing to provide voiced support of their recent signed Hamlet performances but was unwilling to provide open captioning to those who are weak in signing and understanding the spoken words. But the irony is that Gallaudet University put up a Hamlet play when a cruel twist of fate usually happens in a Shakespeare play and this cruel twist of fate is the continued ignorance of deaf/hh students who are new or are in the middle of such worlds.


"This above all: to thine own self be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man."
- William Shakespeare, Hamlet, 1.3

The graduating class: You're not special

To those deaf and hard of hearing students who have graduated from high school or college, I have something to say to you in the hope that you'll be inspired to rethink of what the world awaits you once you get your diploma or degree.

All of your life growing up you have been coddled and pampered upon. You have been fawned and doted upon by your parents and grandparents. Your Mommy or Daddy, or both, have held you, hugged you, kissed you, fed you breakfast, lunch and dinner, wiped your bottom, trained you, taught you, listened to your complaints, your rants, your rage, your sadness and joys. You've had people who encouraged you, sympathized you, consoled you and encouraged you again umpteen times.

And over the years you had your sports games, your theatrical plays, musical recitals, and the many science fairs. Or you became class president, secretary or treasury and delved into school politics or became the school newspaper editor or reporter. Maybe you were well liked by friends and acquaintances where they would smile at you the moment you step into a classroom or whenever you approach them at a cafeteria table. Or they would take delight with your constant tweets or blogs thinking you're cleaver or funny.

Having said those things just don't get the idea that you're special because you're not. You're not the center of it all. The Earth is not the center of our solar system. Our solar system is not the center of its galaxy. Our galaxy is not the center of our universe. You're one of the many thousands of deaf and hard of hearing people who have graduated at a deaf-run school, a mainstreamed one or a regular school. Some graduated as valedictorians or class presidents, often with honors of some sort with glittering trophies and shiny medals and the many accolades that came with it. Each of you at graduation day all dressed alike. Same diploma or same degree that everybody expect to have in their hands with the only difference being it has your name on it.

Instead of thinking you're special, which is a dangerous thing to do, look for challenges in life. Embrace them. Think of it as if you're on a quest to climb one of the highest mountains because it's there. It beckons you and smirks at you saying, "Try and climb me! I bet you can't!"   You climb because it is there. You see it as a challenge. You climb so you can see the world below you and not about whether the world can see you because you're an insignificant speck on that mountain top. No one sees but yourself. You're not special.

There are 6.8 billion people on this planet.  Once you understand that then that's when you may finally understand that you're not that special.  You are preparing and bracing yourself on what life will ultimately give you. But to be sure, please do whatever you do for no other reason than you love it and believe in its importance. And in the process change our culture so that it rewards genuine passion, genuine hard work and genuine achievement instead of accolades as an appeasement.

Happy belated graduation! 

Posting rules....and not just for deaf people only.

I've added a painting of Uncle Sam seen on the upper left side of my blog where it is linked to my 2010 blog piece on rules for posting comments in my blog. A very simple guideline that anyone can understand and follow it, even a caveman can do that.  I'm making this blog to clarify the one thing that a few deaf/hh people have brought up recently thinking that if they leave their name behind and I know who that person is they fear that I will delete their comment while still in moderation mode.

So far that has never happened. Go figure.

The rules I've posted back in 2010 are quite explicit and it doesn't matter if a person post his or her comments anonymously or post comments using their name identifiable to the public. To use the excuse that "I don't want to post my name because you will delete my comment because you don't like me" is a pathetic one if not a cowardly excuse. Bottom line, it doesn't matter if you want to post your comments anonymously or attach it with your name. My posting rules are to be followed. That is where I draw the line on whether a posted comment gets accepted.  Extremely few comments do not get published compared to the thousands that do get through. I am a lot more lax than you think when it comes to moderating comments. But, please, please, do not use the lame excuse that just because you think I don't like you and that once you put your name out and I know who you are thinking that I will delete your comment as a result. Hardly. If you follow my posting rules, you're on safe grounds. Abuse your privilege here then expect your comments not to show up. Quite simple, really. Honest injun!

Hiking for health and leisure

Hiking can be a fun, enjoyable and relaxing form of exercise. I know. I do a lot of hiking (here and here, for example) in my own leisure time. A chance to get outdoors and enjoy the sights, sound, smell, touch and taste of what nature can offer you whether it's plucking some huckleberries along the way to munch on or a get a whiff of wildflowers blooming along the grassy open meadows or seeing the vast openness and grandeur in front of you. Here's a video of a bunch of deaf hikers enjoying their day in the outdoors. Take some time to "get away from it all." Do something bold. Go outdoors and hike!

Cord Blood Stem Cells Treatment for Children

I just couldn't believe it. I read in one discussion forum where one person made a big stink about a current year long study using a deaf baby's own cord blood stem cells to treat the baby's own sensorineural deafness (which has so far appears to continue to help restore the baby's hearing loss) saying it needs to be experimented on animals first to determine the safety of cord blood stem cells. First off, the blood cord stem cells are compatible only to the baby and not in some animal. That sort of ill-conceived logic was enough to make my jaw drop. Secondly, cord blood stem cells are being used to treat a variety of conditions and even injuries such as Traumatic Brain Injury in children in one study which uses the same IV infusion process as with deaf children in a hearing loss treatment Phase I study.

A ground-breaking clinical trial is now underway at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) is an innovative step in a growing number of studies exploring the potential of stem cell-based therapies to help initiate repair and induce healing of damaged brain tissue. The study is being performed in partnership with Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, UTHealth's major children's teaching hospital.

The trial will involve children who have sustained traumatic brain injuries and who have access to their own umbilical cord blood stem cells, which were banked at birth. Children who meet the trial qualifications will travel to Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital to receive an IV infusion of their cord blood stem cells. They will then be followed at six months, one year and two years.

"The reason we have become interested in cord blood cells is because of the possibility of autologous therapy, meaning using your own cells. And the preclinical models have demonstrated some really fascinating neurological preservation effects to really support these Phase 1 trials," says Charles S. Cox, M.D., Children's Fund Distinguished Professor of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatrics at the UTHealth Medical School, director of the Pediatric Trauma Program at Children's Memorial Hermann Hosptial, and principle investigator of the trial. "There's anecdotal experience in other types of neurological injuries that reassures us in terms of the safety of the approach and there are some anecdotal hints at it being beneficial in certain types of brain injury."

The Phase I safety study will enroll 10 children ages 18 months to 17 years who have suffered moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are within 6 to 18 months of their injury.

People need to understand the potential self-healing (literally) factors of using your own cord blood stem cells. According to The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth) on cord blood stem cells:

Cord blood is one source of stem cells that has shown promise in preclinical research and is now being explored in experimental treatments for patients with brain injury. In the preclinical or lab setting, research has shown that cord blood stem cells have the ability to divide and change into neural-like cells. Additionally, these stem cells have been shown to migrate to the area of injury, and to secrete therapeutic factors, which may help repair brain damage. Further preliminary findings from studies underway at UTHealth indicate that cord blood stem cells may also alter the body's immune response to injury, by interacting directly with the organs and cells of the immune system that enable the body to better repair itself.

In other words, you could possibly (and literally so) heal thyself using your own cord blood stem cells by enabling your body, in the example of hearing loss in babies, to better repair itself. Especially among babies who gets treated early on and with the help of their own cord blood stem cells, and if it turns out to be successful for the full restoration on hearing, then it becomes a cure. This process would allow deaf babies early on take advantage of the 4 year window of opportunity to take advantage of the active auditory cortex and be able to grow up as a hearing person in every respect.  With this Traumatic Brain Injury study and the Hearing Loss study.  We should know more the results of these studies by next year on whether cord blood stem cells treatment is a success or not.

Communication is a two way street...captioning, please!

The one thing I've learned in life is that people's perspectives are different from each other based on their life experiences, their upbringings, their interests, and the people they associate with on a daily basis. Those are the things that makes a person for who he or she it. I have met all kinds and are friends with them. Those who have mild hearing loss to those who are profoundly deaf to those who are culturally deaf to those who are hearing whether they know signing or not. And then you have those who prefer to speak/listen to those who prefer to sign only to those who prefer other methods of communicating. They have their own way of communicating and I respect that. That is not for me to judge. But the one common thing we all have in connection, especially among the 36 million people in the United States with hearing loss, is that many of us need captioning in our everyday lives.

But the funny thing is that some people do have a habit of judging others simply because they can hear a little bit better, talk a little bit better, sign a little bit better or the fact they prefer a different way of communicating. So, exactly what is the difference if deaf people on a theater stage signs in ASL but provide no captioning for the audience versus hearing people on a theater stage talking with no captioning for the audience to see what's being spoken? Both are purposefully excluding people who can't hear quite as well to understand fully the spoken words and those who know some, little or no sign language to understand fully what was signed. Both situations discriminate against the majority of people with hearing loss. Both situations do not invite people into their world because of their own ignorance.  Just because a person is deaf or hard of hearing does not mean one is fluent in sign language or knows sign language. Just because a deaf or hard of hearing person can hear some words being spoken does not mean one can hear all of the words being spoken on a theater stage, on television, in a social setting, in a movie theater, and so on.

Why is it ok to have sign language interpreters at a rock concert but not captioning to help caption the lyrics being sung and to help caption what's being said on stage for the listening audience? Why is it ok to have a signing concert but no captioning for those who may not be able to understand it all or do not know sign language? Why is it ok to have a Deaf Awareness Day at Six Flags as a way to help promote awareness about deaf and hard of hearing people but only provide sign language interpreters throughout the park when being deaf or hard of hearing does not mean people magically know sign language?  Communication is a two way street benefiting a variety of people with hearing loss and communication preferences. Providing captions help them feel they as if they are a part of a larger family.  

Noah Buchholz's Journey: Part 3 series

Part 2 of series

Part 1 of series

The New Stem Cells Generation - going from deaf to hearing.

The stuff of science fiction has now arrived where Madeline becomes the first of many toddlers born deaf to get their first cord- blood stem cells treatments in the effort to restore their sensorineural hearing loss. This procedure continues to show success and Madeline's hearing continues to improve.

Madeline Cooper, who is nearly 2 years old, is the first person in the nation to take part in a new Food and Drug Administration-approved study of stem cell treatment of sensorineural hearing loss.

Children’s Memorial Hermann Hospital in Houston and California-based Cord Blood Registry will eventually enroll another nine children in this first phase of the study.

Unlike some advertised stem cell treatments that may cost patients tens of thousands of dollars — and, according to critics, are little more than quackery — the Conners paid nothing to take part and have been promised no specific results.

The process is simple: Doctors inject the children with stem cells from their own stored umbilical cords. Because it is the patients’ own blood, there is little chance the treatment will produce side effects.

In theory, the treatment will adjust patients’ immune systems to encourage their bodies to repair themselves. In truth, researchers have no idea if it will work.

Earlier Italian studies on mice concluded that stem cells may help the body repair damaged cells in the ear and restore some hearing in these types of cases, according to a 2008 published report in the University of South Florida journal Cell Transplantation.

Madeline's hearing loss has gone from extreme to moderate hearing loss since undergoing the treatment. A definite improvement. This stem cell treatment will continue and may take a few years to help fully restore hearing loss. We will not know how fast this rate of restoration will take place over the next several months to a few years. We will know more once the Cooper family head back to Texas in July, and again in January of 2013, to get a more detailed assessment of Madeline’s improvement.

This will be the start of a new generation of cord-blood stem cell babies and toddlers born deaf to become, in theory, hearing with the help of their own blood-cord stem cells. An exciting era in regenerative medicine for parents of deaf children. This new cord-blood stem cell procedure was covered in my blog piece in January 2012 for your review.

Once proved successful parents of deaf babies will see this as the preferred treatment to help restore their child's hearing loss. This will certainly be a much preferable route (and cheaper, too) than to choose cochlear implant.  Now the question becomes, will this eventually destroy the cochlear implant industry? Only time will tell.

Deaf student picked for flight program

It's not often you get to see stories about deaf people becoming airplane pilots. Well, Jason Jernigan is taking up that challenge to become one of the many deaf and hard of hearing pilots in the U.S.

Florida State University Panama City senior Jason Jernigan will undertake five weeks of flight training at Purdue University in Indiana to show that his deafness is not a handicap.

Jernigan, of Youngstown, is the second deaf person to train with Able Flight to learn flight and ground operations. He is one of six men who have been chosen from across the country to win a scholarship for the third year of Able Flight-Purdue University flight training.

“I want to fly because it is one of my life goals,” Jernigan wrote in an email interview. “I really never thought I would get the opportunity. I want to conquer the challenge. I also want to show people that deaf people can do anything a hearing person can do.”

Well who doesn't want to learn how to fly an airplane? If you're up to the task, why not? Ask Stephen Hopson who made aviation history by becoming the world’s first deaf pilot to earn an instrument rating, which actually requires the use of a radio when flying though inclement weather.

Jernigan will leave Florida on Saturday for the program. He has no prior flight experience, but he has played a flying computer game. He believes the biggest challenge will be communications between him and his instructors.

“I will use sign language, iPad, a computer and UbiDuo machine,” Jernigan wrote. “Mostly I will use an UbiDuo (communications device). … [I]t should help greatly with both my pre-flight and post-flight briefing with my instructor.”

The university will benefit from expanding their training to include people with disabilities, according to Charles Stites, the executive director of Able Flight.

Good luck, Jason. Hope the skies will be friendly for ya!

Bad Advertisement during Tax Season

I drove through a town and saw this and took a picture of it when I noticed the building was empty. You can probably guess why. It's enough to make you not go in when tax season cometh. Why take the chance?

The mocking of dea(th)f...

One of the worst thing one can do is to air online in a vlog or blog the apparent glee or dispassionate display of somebody else's death who is related to a deaf person known in the deaf and hard of hearing community.  Either show a modicum of respect in your blog or vlog or don't talk about it at all.  By showing disrespect online makes that person a boorish and dispassionate soul. If it's indifference then keep it to yourself privately and away from the public view. By making it public ranks (almost) right up there on wishing the death of a deaf parent's child just because one doesn't like the deaf parent reeks of insanity.

A Dine and Sign TV Internet Show

Here's an interesting and fun show to watch called "Dine and Sign." A humorous show between a hearing son named Alex and his deaf father having some insightful and funny discussions done in sign language. There are now 35 episodes or almost 3 hours worth of shows beginning on September 26, 2011 broadcasted by Podsmiths Internet Televsion on YouTube. Since then the show has slowly gained a following.  If you want to talk and interact with the Dine and Sign please visit their Facebook page.

What makes this show fun and easy to watch is the accessibility they provide. Each show comes with captioning, signing, and a voice-over for each of the two father and son duo sparring lightheartedly with each other over a variety of topics. With a combination of communication access available it can reach a much broader audience than just the signing community. If you ever want to see what the interaction is like between a deaf father and hearing son then come and watch their first episode and catch up with the rest of their shows at your convenience. Dine and Sign, not exactly a three course meal but satisfying.


Episode one: What's the problem with long hair?

Deaf pitcher aims for pro baseball

It is not everyday you get to hear of a deaf pitcher who can pitch 90 mph fastballs and have a good chance getting into the major leagues. Scouts are certainly taking a hard look at him.

Technology is king for deaf users when it comes to communication

Technology is the key to success for deaf and hard of hearing people. It is true today and it will be more so true into the very near future when it comes to helping provide communication to deaf and hard of hearing with the rest of the world. Google has come out with a new fangled technology that has been in the works for some years called Google Glasses where it hints at speech-to-text display for deaf users:

Perhaps most interestingly, one patent shows Google is working on a system to help hard-of-hearing and deaf users detect and interpret nearby sounds. The glasses' heads-up display would show arrows and flashing lights to indicate the direction and intensity level of the sound, and even display the words nearby people are speaking. The patent, #8,183,997, was issued to Google today and is titled "Displaying sound indications on a wearable computing system." The system would integrate a speech-to-text feature that determines the text of speech and displays it for the wearer of the glasses.

This concept on augmented reality will be a boon to deaf and hard of hearing users in the near future by allowing the extra-dimension of space, time and information of sound and visuals through the use of these glasses.

Lou Ferrigno gets Envoy Esteem hearing implant

I was watching the last episode of Celebrity Apprentice when Lou Ferrigno announced during the live show that he can now hear better with his new Esteem implantable hearing device.

Lou Ferrigno, the actor who played the Hulk on the 1970s TV show "The Incredible Hulk," has begun using an implantable hearing aid from Minnesota's Envoy Medical Corp. Ferrigno, who's had hearing problems since he was young, said last weekend on the finale of Celebrity Apprentice (he was fired in April) that he received the Esteem medical implant, made by White Bear Lake-based Envoy.

In fact, this was successfully kept underwraps until Medical Envoy released a press release yesterday, the day after the show that was aired on Sunday, about Lou and his new implant and successful it was that Lou even cried once it was activated.

Profoundly hard of hearing since two years old, Lou Ferrigno revealed last night on The Celebrity Apprentice that he recently underwent a surgical procedure to restore his hearing, with the Esteem® Device, manufactured by Envoy Medical Corporation. The device is a fully implantable prosthetic cochlea stimulator, designed to do just that. It has no microphones or speakers. It is invisible. Except that Lou knows it was implanted, he has no sense of it being in his body. But he can hear. And according to Lou Ferrigno, it "is a miracle." "Lou's dream has always been to hear like everyone else," said Carla, his wife of 32 years, who encouraged Lou to have the procedure. Now, Lou says he has "natural hearing and can hear things he has never heard before or could have ever hoped to hear." Birds chirping, rain on his roof, his alarm clock in the morning (scares the heck out of him, he says laughing) the tiniest sounds of his fingers moving together, the refrigerator's quiet motor, but most importantly, the ability to hear people in everyday conversation, even in a noisy environment, like a restaurant. "Everything is so loud and so clear," says the actor, who is still trying to figure out certain, never before heard sounds. Ferrigno said he "can't wait to get his second ear done,"

The device was implanted by Dr. Michael Murray of San Jose CA, who has performed hundreds of Esteem® procedures and is booked through September. Lou Ferrigno's surgery was performed in Houston, Texas at Envoy Medical's private ("decadent," according to Murray) surgical center. The entire procedure costs approximately $37,000 for the device and the surgery, and according to Ferrigno, "is worth a lot more." Approved in a 15 to 0 unanimous, independent panel vote by the FDA, the Esteem® is indicated for moderate to severe hearing loss, in people with sensorineural hearing loss (about 85% of all hearing loss sufferers). It replaces conventional hearing aids for those who qualify. The Esteem® Device is also approved by the VA (Veterans Administration) for those who qualify and have it prescribed by their VA audiologist and ENT specialist.

The device works by leveraging the natural anatomy of a person's own body. Sound enters the ear naturally. The natural vibrations of the eardrum are sensed and sent to a microprocessor implanted under the skin behind the ear. The vibrations are intensified and sent to the cochlea via the stapes. The tiny remaining hair cells in the cochlea pick up the vibrations and send them to the brain where they are interpreted as sound. The result, according to the successful recipients, including Lou Ferrigno, is beyond anything a hearing aid can offer. Ferrigno is still amazed at how well it works. "No more hearing aids for me," Lou Ferrigno exclaims with a huge smile on his face. Tears fell from his eyes upon activation. Ferrigno, dumbfounded, said "he was advised by his audiologist not to have the procedure." "Go Figure?" said Ferrigno. Lou said he "hasn't felt this good since he won the Mr. Universe competition."

This is great for Lou. I'm sure he's happy with it as you can see.....just like Sarah Churman.

Bullying

Fortunately I have not been a victim of bullying since I don't see myself as a victim in the first place. Rather I see the perpetrator as someone who wants attention in the effort to raise his or her self-esteem by targeting certain people with their rants and hate. For years as a blogger I've been a target of bullying-tactics by a few deaf people who have graced my blogsite of time's past. The same people who have attacked those commenting in my blog comment box and used profane language against them. Ultimately I was forced to ban them from my blogsite after warning them to cease against attacking people who leave comments in my blog. Even that didn't always work because they usually find a way to continue with the attacking and bullying. But in my own wisdom I've learned to ignore those people who insist on finding ways to target me.

What prompted me to blog about this was because of an article I read on the psychology of bullying asking an interesting question, "Bullies Have Low Self-Esteem Or High Self-Esteem?"

But current research shows that most bullies actually have high self-esteem. Bullies usually have a sense of entitlement and a feeling of superiority over others, and lack compassion, impulse control and social skills. They enjoy being cruel to others and sometimes use bullying as an anger management tool, the way a normally angry person would punch a pillow. Research does support the fact that bullies have low empathy and don’t know how it feels to be in someone else’s shoes.

I never realize that a person who bully sometimes uses it as an anger management tool. That one surprised me but I certainly understand that such attitudes and actions give them the feeling of superiority over others and enjoy being cruel to them in a variety of ways over the internet.  Such cruelties include name calling, put downs, smearing, lying or going after their families or spouses by targeting them in order to get to his/her main target.

More on bullying....

As long as bullies are able to manipulate another person or a situation, their self-esteem goes up. Once bullies lose control of their victim, or realize that they can’t manipulate situations to their liking, their self-esteem goes down. This causes them to look for new victims to manipulate and control so that their self-esteem can go up again. The bullying in itself almost becomes an emotional fix that bullies need in order to feel good about themselves.

Which is why it's important to ignore certain bullies for their bullying tactics because by doing so you are not giving them any opportunity for control or the opportunity to try and manipulate you.  If you can do this  try and block the person from your blog, YouTube, Facebook or anywhere else. The bullies I've come across in the past I see them almost as the equivalent of a druggie who seeks emotional fixes in order to get that same "high." It's almost a description of  stalker looking for his/her next fix.

If you come across a bully, do not try and engage with a bully. Best weapon is to put that online bully on ignore. Or, if you can, try and ban that person. That's what I did and I was able to take that control away from the few bullies who knew no better. It takes confidence to wrest control away from an online bully by the mere simple act of ignoring the bully in the first place. You have that power.

Video of deaf film maker on deaf role models from across the pond

Deaf Echo Attack Website?

This just happened not too long ago and it concerns me a great deal regarding the security and protection for my laptop when I attempted to access Deaf Echo's website and got this warning:

I'm not sure exactly what's going on over there and people should be made aware of this. I have visited the Deaf Echo numerous times yet this Attack Page warning pop up concerned me greatly. I'm not sure what to do at this point whether to continue on or not. The Safe Browsing Client by Google in the Safe Browsing diagnostic page explains why the warning was put up.

Some of you might be wondering if this blog is a malicious blog piece aimed at the owner despite our differences. Hardly the case when I'm given the Safe Browsing diagnostic page on explaining the warning. I'm sure the owner is not aware that there might be some programs installed on his Deaf Echo community blogsite that may not be healthy for computer laptops of those visiting their website. The owner will need to rectify this problem on his own accord. Once the problem is corrected I will provide an update. I sure do like to visit Deaf Echo again.

Any computer nerds out there that can add to this piece of warning info? This is the first time a warning like this has ever happened.

UPDATE: The Google search page for "Deaf Echo" has put out a warning, too. The owner of the Deaf Echo website needs to correct whatever is causing that problem quickly.

UPDATE II:  Looks like whatever caused the warning has now been corrected.

First typewriter invention for the deaf?

There's no mention whether Pastor Rasmus Hans Johan Malling-Hansen's invention on one of the first typewriter (and perhaps the best looking and most beautiful piece of typewriter machinery of all time) produced was inspired to invent this because of his association with deaf people in Denmark.  A way to "write faster" and communicate quicker with deaf people.  I bring that up since he was the minister and principal at the Royal Institute for the Deaf-mutes in Copenhagen and that he excelled as a reformer in his field, education for the deaf and deaf-mutes.

RMH was the driving force behind the development of education for the deaf-mutes in Denmark, particularly in terms of the organizational set up and the formulation of comprehensive goals. In cooperation with Johan Keller he managed to introduce a reform in 1867, whereby the pupils were grouped according to their learning abilities and degree of hearing loss, such that they would all benefit from the kind of education and methods that were best adapted to their situation. He was behind the establishment of the institute in Fredericia in 1881 and was the driving force in the public commission of 1888, whose proposals were accepted and turned into reality after his death: The government took over the private institutes, a new institute was established in Nyborg, and all the schools for the deaf and deaf-mutes were integrated into one general organization and plan. Fredericia was selected as a pre-school at which all deaf-mutes must stay for a year in order for the teachers to assess their individual abilities and needs, before they would gain entrance to the school or institution, whose methods could cater for their specific needs and abilities in the best possible way. RMH's modern and far-sighted vision became a reality! This was well known in Scandinavia as "the Danish division (selection)" and became highly influential in the other Nordic countries.

A description about Rasmus Hans' typewriter and the first invention of the writing ball:

The writing ball was not only the first typewriter to be produced and sold in a relatively large quantity, it is also the fastest typewriter ever made, because of the unique construction of the "ball". Malling-Hansen was experimenting with the placement of the letters already in 1865 - and he succeeded in finding a placement of the letters that made the writing speed extremely fast. Not many people know that the traditional qwerty-keyboard was designed with the goal of preventing the arms from "hanging up" in each other, and in no way was designed to get the fastest writing speed - on the contrary!

I'm surmising at this point whether his typewriter and writing ball invention which was finally patented in 1870 and "mass produced" beginning in 1872 was a subconscious effort on finding ways to communicate faster and better with deaf people rather than by pen and paper. Or perhaps it was a conscious effort of his on finding ways to educate deaf people through the use of his "extremely fast" typewriter even though nothing is documented to say that was the case.  The timing of his typewriter invention occurred during a period while he was the minister and principal at the Royal Institute for the Deaf-mutes in Copenhagen and the fact that he excelled as a reformer in his field, education for the deaf and deaf-mutes would appear suspect as perhaps his primary reason to invent his typewriter was partly because of his association of all things with deaf people.

Now, if you ask me, Rasmus Hans Johan Malling-Hansen's typewriter certainly look quite steampunk to me. Quite a gorgeous piece. There are plenty of steampunk typewriters today. Perhaps the Malling-Hansen's typewriter could be put into a collection of all things steampunk deaf? 

Steampunk Deaf

Not much in the genre of steampunk of things related to deaf or hard of hearing people other than certain steampunk type of technology like a hearing aid seen in one of the steampunk blogs.

If you remember watching the movie Wild, Wild West with Will Smith and Kevin Kline you will see it has all of the element of steampunk feel to it. And then you may remember McGrath "Bloodbath"
who wore a retro looking "hearing aid" which was retro of that era, anyway.

Here's another true to its form steampunk hearing aid.

Of course, you then have steampunk hands of large proportion and I wonder if a deaf person could make two fully articulating hands of enormous size would he be able to sign with them? Boggles the mind if somebody could do that, steampunk style that is.

Here's a truly big hand.

And this one, too.

Deaf forester instructs on how to get pine cones

Here's Andy, again, a deaf silviculturist (see previous blog of him signing a story about Smokey Bear to deaf kids) who gives an instructional video about preparing for a tree climb and how to get fresh pine cones safely while working on the Coconino National Forest in Arizona. How often do you get to see a deaf forester do an instructional video on tree climbing? Pretty neat, I'd say.

Deaf forester signs to deaf kids on Smokey Bear story

Here's a deaf silviculturist who works for the U.S. Forest Service signs a story about Smokey Bear to a group of deaf kids. And the kids get a surprise visit at the end of the story.

He is one of the many deaf/hh employees who works for the U.S. Forest Service. Not often do deaf kids get exposed to a deaf person who works for the U.S. Forest Service and in full uniform, too. So, this was a great thing that Andy did for the kids that day. And speaking of Smokey Bear, here's my youngest daughter from 10 years ago at a Smokey Bear museum in Capitan, New Mexico which is the birth place of Smokey Bear.

The adventurous life and love story of Mable

Here's an interesting piece of history with a bunch of black and white photos written by the National Geographic. A piece that covers the human side on the life and adventurous times of Mabel Gardiner Hubbard (late deafened at age 5) who was married to Alexander Graham Bell. What sealed the National Geographic relationship with the Bell family was that Mable and Alexander G. Bell had two daughters together named Elsie and Daisy where Elsie grew up and married Gilbert Hovey Grosvenor who was National Geographic magazine’s first editor-in-chief. That solidified the family ties with the National Geographic company.

Gallaudet University's Rock Festival 2002

Rock Festival as it is known at Gallaudet University has been around quite awhile for well over twenty years, for me that is but this year is their 40th anniversary. If you have been at Gallaudet University long enough chances are you attended some of the Rock Festivals there.  In 2002 a hearing band called "Mutaytor" played at Gallaudet University and on their old discontinued website you can see the many pictures of 2,500 Gallaudet students rocking their night away under the thumping, reverberating blast from 6 foot tall speakers. Do you recognize anybody in those pictures? And if you went to a Rock Festival event while as a Gallaudet student, why did you go and did you like the band?  And, yes, that was 10 years ago but don't feel bad. Mine goes further back.

Noah Buchholz's Journey: Part 2 series.

Check out Noah's captioned video series Part 2 about his own communication journey.

Oh gawd...I'm deaf...I'm hoh.....

Watch this captioned video. It's great! A deaf/hh guy from the U.K. talking about deafness...his and other people's...and things in general regarding it. Don't be afraid of who you are and don't let your deafness stop you from doing what you want to do in life.

sComm ships largest order

sComm has made history by delivering its largest order of UbiDuo communication devices to more than 1,250 Social Security Administration (SSA) field offices around the United States.

These communication devices will enable Social Security staff to interact directly and immediately with clients who are deaf or hard of hearing who walk into SSA office for assistance to discuss their SSI/SSDI benefits. Rather than using paper and pen or waiting for a sign language interpreter to arrive, the staff can turn on the UbiDuo and within seconds begin engaging a conversation with the client. This portable communication tool can be carried anywhere within an office, and its self-powered battery provides power when electrical outlets are not available.

The UbiDuo has a full-size keyboard and screen on each half. Communication is instant, with text showing on both halves as soon as it’s typed, there’s no delay like with instant messaging programs.

Its speed and ease-of-use will enable Social Security staff to better meet the needs of its clients who are deaf, hard of hearing, or other communication challenges. For example, clients who can hear but have difficulty speaking because of a tracheotomy or a stroke can use the UbiDuo.

Below are additional photos of UbiDuo communication devices at the sComm warehouse prior to delivery and on day of delivery. Photos are exclusive for Kokonut Pundit blogsite.

sComm is the engineer and manufacturer of the UbiDuo communication device. sComm is a privately-held company in Raytown, MO. The company was founded in 2005. The idea of the UbiDuo was born out of frustration when father and son were trying to interact with each other face-to-face over breakfast at a restaurant. sComm stands for "simultaneous communications." Face-to-Face Communication solution offers fast and direct communication for the Deaf & Hard of Hearing

LOcuTUS Two

Spinning off of the LOcuTUS One blog piece I did recently while today I'll discuss perceived rejection from a community and identity of self.

In one Star Trek:TNG show the Borg collective was able to successfully assimilate Captain Picard into their collective by capturing him and forcing him to become a part of the hive as one mind. He lost all sense of personality and identity where as on the Enterprise ship his identity was with his crew, his life experiences and personality that made all the difference.  A ship filled with diversity of  people like Geordi La Forge who is blind but wears a special visor that helps him see better - a technology of the time that allowed him to see more things than the natural eye ever could. Or Counselor Troi who have telepathic abilities. Or Worf's ability as a fearless warrior? A ship where respect for their fellow crew and passengers is seen regardless of race, experience, upbringings, ethnic and cultural differences, and special abilities or even those lacking normal eyesight when it doesn't matter because technology helped overcome blindness.  But the height of irony came when Captain Picard and crew did the unthinkable by welcoming a Borg ("you will be assimilated") named Hugh to come and stay on the Enterprise ship should he decide to do so. Even at the risk of losing the Enterprise when the Borg ship comes looking for Hugh. There were no rejection of Hugh near the end of that episode because the crew on the Enterprise ship finally understood Hugh by getting to know him better once he was disconnected from the Borg hive. He was able to regain some sense of his own humanity, personality and awareness of self to know better about the human race. But in the end Hugh made the decision to return back to the Borg collective for reason not what you might think.

All that reminded me a blog piece I did called "The Solution" about Amy and her experience at rejection and how many people associate with Amy her attempt to communicate in a social setting with a group of signing deaf and hearing people.

I am "Amy," as are about two million other severely hearing impaired walking around… And the abuse we are subject to by the ASL Deafies was so elegantly acted out by none other than an ASL Deafie himself.

But what is interesting is to compare some of the thoughts between an oral and hard of hearing person versus a culturally deaf person regarding the Amy video seen in my "The Solution" blog piece when it came to communicating with other deaf people. Even though Amy made the effort to pick up a few new signs and made an attempt to finger spell her name and picked up a few more signs but was ultimately rejected.

This woman who grew up oral and HOH and appears to have been raised in a non-signing environment responded in the original YouTube video source in the comment section about Amy said this:

I grew up oral and HOH and currently learning ASL. Had this HOH girl a sincere interest in making Deaf ASL friends, she could have at the very least, learned a few signs and bring pen and paper to communicate with both the hearing and the ASL Deaf. This video reinforced what I already knew, being stuck between 2 worlds sucks! I'm rather puzzled this HOH girl still didn't learn to bring pen and paper. Does she want to deliberately make communication harder than it has to be?

Versus Candy who is culturally deaf with culturally deaf parents chimed in another blog about the same video. Candy has a different approach and positive outlook said this:

I happen to know all kinds of deaf/hh folks and when one of them approach me not knowing signs, I do make an effort to involve them, even though they do not know signs. It's rude to be ignoring them and having the mindset that it's too bad they don't know signs. The attitude of those signing deaf folks who treat oral deaf is what hurts the deaf world. I was taught to treat everyone the same and I do. My deaf cultured parents taught me that and they practice the same too.

Typically those that do not want to learn signs would not have made an effort to approach signing deaf people.

Manners is what is lacking among many.

Two different approaches on how to deal with a deaf/hh newcomer to a signing community. Which ones do you think would have had a bigger impact? Candy made a great point seen in the underline bold about those who would approach a group of signing deaf people. Amy would not have made an effort to approach signing deaf people if she didn't want to learn new signs.

And then you have Lotus who is oral and hard of hearing had this to say about the video and more in a discussion forum that took place recently:

Lotus: So, what did you guys think of this video? Personally, I think it makes a compelling argument as to why a hard of hearing person should learn ASL if she wants to integrate into the Deaf community and have the common sense to bring pen and paper if she is struggling to understand what the hearing people are saying. Having grown up oral and HOH, I finally learned that one does not HAVE to remain stuck in between two worlds, that one CAN do something about this and be pro-active about it. They are not doomed to a fate that cannot be changed.

According to one blog by an HOH guy, this video is about how badly HOH people are treated by ASL Deafs even though it's very clear in the video that the Deaf woman tried hard to converse with the HOH girl. In fact, it was the Deaf woman who said hi first. This HOH girl attempts to join an ASL conversation even though she doesn't know the language. The thing is, if two people don't speak the same language, it's rather difficult to hold a conversation. Pretty evident that the HOH blogger harbors negative feelings towards the deaf community, even though he himself also has a hearing problem. I feel sorry for this hearing wanna-be blogger........ One can be deaf and happy although he doesn't seem to think it's possible and that being HOH is a better way to live, even though the video proved that being an oral HOH means being left out of both worlds and it's a miserable place to be in. Have to confess that I was stunned that this HOH blogger seems to think the solution for HOH is to use simcomm where basically you communicate with another person using what looks like a typewriter. yeah, the solution for the deaf/hoh to talk to deaf/hoh is not ASL, it's a cumbersome piece of equipment that looks like a typewriter. Personally, ASL and pen and paper is far far more convenient plus simcomm won't fit in either my back pocket or my evening purse. I'd rather write on a napkin!

Of course, Lotus is talking about me as that "HOH blogger." And she got it wrong about a technological communication solution I often speak of.  But the funny thing is that over the last 24 years I have signed in ASL/PSE and I have never felt rejected by the deaf community because I am in many ways am a part of the deaf/hh community and by convention a part of the hearing community, too. The real problem is the few culturally deaf people who have rejected or not have accepted me for a variety of reasons over something that I have no control of. They are the least of my worries. I have not rejected nor have negative feelings towards the culturally deaf community because I have always recognized their uniqueness and abilities. After all, I did go to Gallaudet University, Lotus did not.

I still interact with both deaf kids and adults and have done so since the days as a student at Gallaudet University since 1988. And it was great yesterday to be with a bunch of deaf kids and their deaf parents helping pull weeds during Earth Day weed round up and help them learn more about the environment. This is one example of many. I think Lotus' confusion and obvious bias rest on the fact that she failed to take the time to know who I am  and instead preferred to make generalized assumptions about myself, wrongly I might add, and what I supposedly believe or how I feel. Instead of assuming, why not ask, Lotus?  My world is not your world, your world is not my world, and I have my own preferences on how and who I want to interact with. I have no desire to make any presumptions about Lotus' own feelings or identity.

I have my own preferences on which culturally deaf people I'd like to be friends with or who I don't mind hanging out with, of course. The same goes with non-signing deaf, hard of hearing and hearing people on who I prefer to be with. I see myself as a hard of hearing person. I also see myself as a deaf person. I wear a hearing aid. I am fluent in sign language. I am fluent in the spoken language and speak effortlessly. I went to Gallaudet University. I like playing ragtime piano. I like listening to talk radio while I drive my truck. I've produced videos in sign language with captioning as part of my signing discussions in DVTV. I am an opinionated person. Yet, I respect other people's opinions rather use ad hominem when some people think it takes the place of an effective argument. I like talking on the phone. I like talking over the video phone. I take advantage of communication technology when I'm at work like real time captioning for video conference meetings or use transcribers at large meetings. I like to talk, listen and be a part of small group of hearing people in a conversation. The same goes for being part of a signing conversation with a group of deaf people as I have done so for more than 24 years. I am comfortable with my identity and who I am. I don't feel "stuck" between two worlds because I enjoy both. I live how I want to live my life. It does not matter if you cannot function at the same level as I can or anybody else. I am happy for who I am and not about what I am. I do not presume what's better for other people to live their lives or be critical of them on how they choose to live their life when it comes to their deafness and the people they associate with. Again, my world is not your world, and vice versa.

As for the supposed limitations there are ways on how a non-signer deaf person could interact with either the hearing or culturally deaf people whether by using pen and paper, sign language, real time captioning, talking and lip-reading, using the hearing aids, cochlear implants or Esteem Envoy implantable hearing device (which is NOT a hearing aid), or using an existing face to face technology that allow communicating in a written language in real time with hearing people. The solutions are many as I've explained many times before for years. Technology has made much of our lives easier when it comes to communication. The real attitude is how you approach a solution that fits you depending on a situation.

The point I made in my earlier blog about the Amy video was about how willing are deaf or hearing people to take the time to have a genuine face to face conversation? Or will they continue to reject others simply because they cannot hear well or do not know sign or have misplaced assumptions about them? The real limitations are those who do not have the patience or take the time to communicate with other people regardless of how it is done and the opportunity to get to know them in person. Candy's example is a powerfully positive one.

Captain Picard and Hugh lived in two different worlds at one time but eventually they had a choice on which world they would prefer to live in. Captain Picard who was once a Borg named Locutus who in the end ultimately accepted Hugh, a longtime Borg, without question and gave him the opportunity to choose which world he wanted to belong. Huge was once part of the human race as a boy was able to experience his long lost identity and human feelings separate from the hive's collective thought while on the Enterprise ship. Huge ultimately decided (as a sacrifice and to save Picard's crew and ship) to return back to the Borg ship and continue to be a Borg. A conscious choice he made. Captain Picard who was once Locutus was able to re-assert his deeply locked away human identity in order to become Picard again who quickly rejoined the human race with the help of the Enterprise crew. Picard was able to retain those feelings and understanding on what it was like to be a Borg, a revulsion and hatred he developed against the Borg collective for violating his human identity when he was forced to become a Borg. But it was that experience that caused him to finally understand Hugh when he became "human" again by asserting his independence using the personal pronoun "I."  There is no "I" for a Borg. And it was Hugh's own past experience once as a young human boy that gave him the ability to understand Picard's human race once Hugh became disconnected from the Borg collective thoughts. Two different worlds and both were able to gain valuable insight from each other only because him and his crew were able to get to know each other in person.

The message? Don't presume to think you know everything about the person until you meet him or her in person and get to know the person better.  It's better not to presume and be critical about it because chances are you'll be horribly mistaken.

UPDATE: A slight edit was done in this blog by removing a nom de plume of one person for the sake of calming people down. Secondly, a clarification. I am not making any parallels between Lotus and Locutus. If you note the spelling and capitalized letters you will see two names. Two different and separate person but the story provides an insight and a message.

UPDATE II:  Linking a person's AD account in my blog? Never did that. Never happened. All I linked was to the YouTube account's name that had the comment response in question that I copied for my blog. There was never any linking to any AD url addresses. I never mentioned anything or linked to anything about AD. There were only two sites that I did discuss and that was YouTube and ND. Instead of jumping to conclusion like always read carefully next time before claiming that I linked to AD.

Noah Buchholz's Journey: Part 1 series.

Part 1 of the Documentary series following Noah Buchholz's journey at Princeton Theological Seminary as the only deaf student. He uses the UbiDuo face to face communication technology everywhere on campus allowing him to interact with his hearing peers. The UbiDuo has given him more communication freedom than ever before.

When comedy isn't really comedy....

There are times when we would shake our heads at a comedian who tries his hands on at being a deaf person doing the fake signing while in the backdrop a fake interpreter would "interpret" to the laughing audience on what he's "saying." One could chalk this one up as ignorance for the crowd of hearing people with a different life and experience who find it funny. But the other group, the signing community, would see that quite differently. One man's comedy is another man's laughter but one man's comedy can also be another man's disdain with the act deserving the trash can, too.

Deaf Blue Man Group

There are casting calls for Blue Man Group Casting for Chicago, New York City, and Los Angeles for April, July and August depending on which city. They are asking for your headshot and resume to be sent in prior to the casting dates. If you aren't familiar with Blue Man here's a video of them in action:
I wonder if anybody, deaf or hard of hearing, has ever tried out or plan to try out for the casting this year? I think it'd be great to see a deaf/hh Blue Man Group utilizing their own unique set of skills and ability to interact with the deaf/hh crowd.

LOcuTUS One

It's a strange world sometimes in the deaf community, especially when you participate in a forum attended mostly by deaf people, many of them signers. Some are even CIborgs which is a running joke by those who love their CIs who facetiously say this although nothing like Locutus of Borg when Captain Picard of Star Trek became a Borg. They are still human beings. This strangeness I'm talking about is in the form of misunderstandings and rigid thinking that happens once in a while. This usually happens when suspicion abounds which result in one-sided prejudicial thinking. One instance is not understanding the purpose of the UbiDuo thinking it had to do with Simcom which actually happened in a real discussion.

Have to confess that I was stunned that this HOH blogger seems to think the solution for HOH is to use Simcom where basically you communicate with another person using what looks like a typewriter. yeah, the solution for the deaf/hoh to talk to deaf/hoh is not ASL, it's a cumbersome piece of equipment that looks like a typewriter. Personally, ASL and pen and paper is far far more convenient plus simcomm won't fit in either my back pocket or my evening purse. I'd rather write on a napkin!

First of all, the UbiDuo is a Face-to-Face (F2F) communication device that employs typing wirelessly the words to a person across from you using the same communication device. All done using the written language such as English in this case.  Frankly, it's impossible to do Simcom while using the UbiDuo.

I suppose this person somehow mixed up the name of the company sComm calling it as simcomm. sComm is an abbreviation for Simultaneous Communication. A company that makes the UbiDuo product. A communication device that allow wirelessly typing of words between two people, typically one deaf and one hearing person.  UbiDuo users are able to communicate seamlessly and in real time much like what a real conversation takes place.  Up to four people can use the UbiDuo using two separate units. The UbiDuo could also be used between a hearing mute person and hearing person. Or between a stutterer and a hearing person. Regardless, the UbiDuo fills that niche when signing or writing on a piece of paper simply won't do when it comes down to having full and rich conversations all done in real time.

The second misunderstanding is that some people think the UbiDuo replaces ASL. Not true. Many of the UbiDuo users are native ASL users and signers. Even the co-founder and deaf owner of sComm relies on sign language interpreters in large and small settings. But when it comes to a one to one communication opportunities the UbiDuo fills that niche nicely in communicating with other people in real time whether it's doing breaking business deals with hearing clients, conversations in social settings with hearing people such as in bars and restaurants, interactions with hearing customers, impromptu meetings with your hearing boss or supervisor, or catching up on missed family interactions by those who don't know sign language. That niche to fill is rather large when you think about it.

Instead of assuming what the UbiDuo does, please take the time to ask the company or visit their website to learn more about the UbiDuo communication device and the people who have successfully used it.

BTW, I do not get any commission from selling the UbiDuo. The owner of sComm is a great friend of mine. I've known him since 2005. Ever since 2005 when I first learned about his company and began blogging about it only because I believed in his product was the answer on helping close many of the communication gaps between deaf and hearing people. Both he and I share the same philosophy and vision about communication access using technology as a mean to bridge the communication gap between deaf and hearing people. I simply believe in his patented communication device, the UbiDuo. And so I blog about it exclusively because I know it works. It has given countless deaf people greater independence and confidence in communicating with hearing people in real time. I've seen lives changed because of this. I've seen deaf people get promoted because the UbiDuo allowed them the initiative to forge ahead independently. I've seen family members weep because they were able to communicate fully with their son or daughter for the first time. It's sad, yes, but enlightening at the same time that it has helped open doors to thousands of users, both deaf and hearing, all across the globe. It's about gaining greater independence. It's about more freedom and opportunities.

ASL or sign language will always be there. The UbiDuo simply facilitates the communication in real time between a deaf and non-signer hearing person in a variety of settings and situations. Nothing more, nothing less.

Stem Cell Cure Success for Deaf Babies

Breaking News! Today the St. Moog Catholic University Auditory Clinic and Research Center became the first university in the world to successfully restore sensorineural hearing loss (nerve deafness) in 20 bilaterally deaf babies (age 8 months to 2 years old) in its year long Phase II human application research stage. A gain of 60 to 70 dB was successfully restored in all of the babies previously born with sensorineural hearing loss who had severe to profound hearing loss. The restored hearing remained stable after a year and showed no signs of loss or change. Ear hair cells were successfully grown in the cochlea using dead viruses as natural vectors to deliver each of the baby's own stem cells into their ears. The restoration rate was similar to birds who have the ability to self-restore their own damaged hearing in a matter of weeks. Researchers and parents were equally delighted by the results. It was said that the regeneration of sensorineural hearing loss would take a few decades to achieve but they have already reached that milestone so quickly.

Mark on your calendar April 1, 2012 as the day when parents of deaf babies will soon have the option to restore their babies' sensorineural hearing loss with this easy to use medical application.

Bookworm

Here's a great website which looks through all of the articles in the pre-print service arXiv where you can compare term usage seen in articles as it search for trends in hundreds of thousands of scientific articles. The trend I looked for are "cochlear implant," "hearing aids," "sign language," "cued speech," and "deaf education."

Here are the results:

As you can see since 2011 the number of articles on sign language has dropped dramatically while cued speech, deaf education, cochlear implant and hearing aids jumped up dramatically. For a better up close graph result go here.

For sign language it has peaked twice around 2010 and mid-2011 but it appears to be waning while deaf education, cued speech, cochlear implant and hearing aids appear to be over taking sign language.

What can we infer from all of this is anybody's guess. Perhaps over the next 5 to 10 years we will probably get a better sense of the on going trend. Although in Google Trends it shows that the term "sign language" is on the downward trend which seems to corroborate the Book worm search while other terms in Google Trends appear to be relatively static.

UPDATE: I also looked separately on trends in Google Books Ngram. For books that discuss sign language from 1880 to 2008 you can see it peaked around 1998 and has been going down ever since.  On cochlear implant it peaked around 2002. On hearing aids it peaked in 2000. On deaf education it peaked around 1995.  And on cued speech it peaked around 1997.