A new article in The Cutting Edge came out late yesterday about California's AB-2072 bill where it laboriously use Nazi examples and labels about that bill. This bill is about allowing parents of newborns diagnosed with hearing loss be given information on communication and educational options where it does include ASL as one clear option. It's a resource that will allow parents make an informed decision after doing their research and who to contact. When people use Nazi examples or references inappropiately as an argument it's called Godwin's Law or Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies. Drenching it with words like "eugenics" and "Nazi-style" elimination won't win the argument. Especially when you throw in conspiracy theories and accusations against other organizations. It'll simply marginalize certain Deaf groups even further onto the fringe by those who opposed AB-2072 bill whenever Nazi references are used. This bill gives parents the necessary resource and power to make an informed decision and by no one else.
I think this is a good bill. It's an opportunity to capitalize ASL even further once passed.
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Monday, June 21, 2010
The Mysterious Disappearance of "Deaf Dynamic Duo!"
My reaction to last week's "Deaf Dynamic Duo's"suggestive responses to my earlier vlog where I praised their creativity but their videos have mysteriously vanished after only barely week! Why? Even the YouTube "DDD" channel disappeared as well and started to rack up subscribers, too! The video by Barb Digi and Dawn Schriver was an amusing video. But I'm disappointed. Why has the DDD team disappeared? What happened to the last of the DDD's funny video "Holy Tank Tops!" ?
Addendum: I removed the videos since it'd be pointless to have my video up if the DDD's video isn't up to see what the joke is all about.
Sorry folks.
Addendum: I removed the videos since it'd be pointless to have my video up if the DDD's video isn't up to see what the joke is all about.
Sorry folks.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
A poll: Do you approve AB2072 bill?
Here's a poll on California's AB2072 bill. Below is a video about what AB 2072 is about.
Warning: This poll is not a scientific poll.
Warning: This poll is not a scientific poll.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Vinton Cerf accepted award from AGBell !
Vinton Cerf as some of you may know is the "Father of the Internet." He is also deaf. But here is probably a little known fact among those in the Deaf community. Vinton Cerf was awarded the Alexander Graham Bell Medal for his contribution on the internet. AGBell recognized Vinton Cerf's extra-ordinary contribution in helping build the first ever internet. The real surprise is that this medal award took place 13 years ago. Maybe it's time that the Deaf community demand that Vinton Cerf return his AGBell medal back to AGBell? And if Vinton Cerf refuses to return his medal back to AGBell then perhaps the Deaf community ought to stage a boycott against using the internet as a show of solidiarity hoping that Vinton Cerf will cave into their demands?
Yeah, I bet you wouldn't.
(correction: changed "Vincent" to "Vinton" which is his correct first name).
Yeah, I bet you wouldn't.
(correction: changed "Vincent" to "Vinton" which is his correct first name).
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Sock! Pow! It's the Deaf Dynamic Duo!!
"Holy Kleenex Batman! It was right under our nose and we blew it!" - an actual Robin quote in a Batman show in 1966. Yeah, you heard it right. Here's the new Deaf Dynamic Duo who just now set up a YouTube site to use their mocking superpowers on unsuspecting riff raffs. PoW! BiFF! WhaMMo! Holy tank top, Batman! It's Kokonut Pundit!
These two Deaf ladies obviously saw my vlog a few days ago on "audism," "deafhood," and "deaf hate crime." They decided to do a mocking vlog on me yet I'm honored at the same time that they even took the time and effort to do this. Also, kudos to them on their creativity! I decided to promote their video here on my Kokonut Pundit blog! And a special surprise, too. This blog is my 1,500th blog! Big thanks to the two ladies for helping me make my 1,500th blog piece!
ADDENDUM: My video removed since it refers to DDD's video below which is no longer available.
I'm honored! Thank you ladies for watching my vlog!
Now, folks, watch the Deaf Dynamic Duo in action! Holy Kleenix, Batman! Warning: it is not subtitled.
DDD's VIDEO REMOVED - not working.
UPDATE: As you may have noticed the "Dynamic Duo's" video is no longer available. It was deleted. Interesting. And I wonder why? Also, more of their videos are no longer public but made private. I wonder why? Are they insecure about showing their videos to the general public and make them fully accessible to watch? Why the sudden deletion, ladies?
These two Deaf ladies obviously saw my vlog a few days ago on "audism," "deafhood," and "deaf hate crime." They decided to do a mocking vlog on me yet I'm honored at the same time that they even took the time and effort to do this. Also, kudos to them on their creativity! I decided to promote their video here on my Kokonut Pundit blog! And a special surprise, too. This blog is my 1,500th blog! Big thanks to the two ladies for helping me make my 1,500th blog piece!
ADDENDUM: My video removed since it refers to DDD's video below which is no longer available.
I'm honored! Thank you ladies for watching my vlog!
Now, folks, watch the Deaf Dynamic Duo in action! Holy Kleenix, Batman! Warning: it is not subtitled.
DDD's VIDEO REMOVED - not working.
UPDATE: As you may have noticed the "Dynamic Duo's" video is no longer available. It was deleted. Interesting. And I wonder why? Also, more of their videos are no longer public but made private. I wonder why? Are they insecure about showing their videos to the general public and make them fully accessible to watch? Why the sudden deletion, ladies?
Wednesday, June 09, 2010
Monday, June 07, 2010
Jumping the "deaf hate crime" bandwagon
My video look at "deaf hate crime." Is it over-rated? Abused? Used as a weapon of choice? Or is this really nothing new under the sun?
When a deaf person is mocked for his voice...by another deaf person
Imagine a deaf person mocking or making fun of another deaf person's use of his/her own voice. Well, it does happen. It's even worse when someone goes after a deaf father and his deaf son who wears a cochlear implant. And I have a video response for that based on a recent YouTube incident between Russell Errigo and ASL1817.
Here's my video seen below.
In the beginning I sign, and then I switch over to voice just to make a point, and then in the end I resume signing. This was brought up when ASL1817 used the opportunity to slam Russell Errigo about his speaking ability even though he didn't ask ASL1817's opinion for it. It was all centered around a topic about Russell's son, Dominic, and his ability to speak and listen with the use of his cochlear implant. A success if anything else. It's a double edged sword when you happen to be the deaf parents of a deaf child in a Deaf community even though the parents know ASL but gets their child implanted with cochlear implant at age 2. This is all about early intervention. Something that, apparently so, Russell and his wife knew about early on. You can find the video of Russell's son and the comments that came with it in YouTube.
Here's my response to ASL1817's attempt to slam Russell in more ways than one.
Here's my video seen below.
In the beginning I sign, and then I switch over to voice just to make a point, and then in the end I resume signing. This was brought up when ASL1817 used the opportunity to slam Russell Errigo about his speaking ability even though he didn't ask ASL1817's opinion for it. It was all centered around a topic about Russell's son, Dominic, and his ability to speak and listen with the use of his cochlear implant. A success if anything else. It's a double edged sword when you happen to be the deaf parents of a deaf child in a Deaf community even though the parents know ASL but gets their child implanted with cochlear implant at age 2. This is all about early intervention. Something that, apparently so, Russell and his wife knew about early on. You can find the video of Russell's son and the comments that came with it in YouTube.
Here's my response to ASL1817's attempt to slam Russell in more ways than one.
Sunday, June 06, 2010
Famous deaf talk show radio personality gets married.
Well, Rush Limbaugh finally got married, again. The marriage ceremony took place in Florida where the cochlear implant wearing Rush Limbaugh took his vows with 33 year old Kathryn Rogers. Rush shelled out a cool $1 million dollars to pay for Elton John's service to sing at his wedding. Something I'm sure that Elton John will get some grief for later on.
Saturday, June 05, 2010
Tenth anniversary for "Association of Adult Musicians with Hearing Loss"
The Association of Adult Musicians with Hearing Loss group will be celebrating their 10th anniversary on June 8, 2010. These are deaf and hard of hearing musicians who have a love for playing their musical instruments and their music. Over the years it has grown painfully slow until the last few years we have seen more new members join than the last 8 years. Currently there are 156 members that play all kinds of musical instruments from the flute, piano, guitar, banjo to singing with their voice. This is a mixed group of those born with hearing loss to those who lost their hearing later in life who either wear hearing aids, cochlear implants or none at all. The two things that we all have in common is hearing loss and a passion to play our musical instrument. Having a hearing loss does stop these people from enjoying their musical instruments.
If you want to join and be part of this group that discusses anything from hearing loss issues to video recitals to web chats to discussing the history of music, you'll have to start by going here to begin the membership process. And join the growing ranks of adult musicians with hearing loss.
If you want to join and be part of this group that discusses anything from hearing loss issues to video recitals to web chats to discussing the history of music, you'll have to start by going here to begin the membership process. And join the growing ranks of adult musicians with hearing loss.
Money donated to "Deafhood? No thanks" Facebook group
In a surprise move that came out of the blue a somewhat mysterious donor is in the process of donating $656 to a newly established Facebook group called "Deafhood? No thanks." It was explained that the money to be donated is contingent on seeing membership hit 400 members, which could happen sometime today. This somewhat large sum of money came as an unexpected surprise never thinking this sort of thing would ever happen. Of course, by the time you're done reading this you might be kicking yourself.
Monday, May 31, 2010
Adversity - a perspective from a deaf/hh person.
Here's my video blog discussing "adversity" and what it means to me. A chance for the Deaf community to see my side of my communication preference. This video is also a message of support to deaf and hard of hearing people, everybody. And a message of hope to parents of deaf/hh children as well that in life, anything is possible.
Transcript for the signing part:
Transcript for the signing part:
What is adversity?
It is not the same thing as overcoming oppression. It's about overcoming obstacles in life successfully. Here I produced a video blog about 3 years ago in the desert landscape of New Mexico to discuss adversity. My vlog was a message of support to the deaf and hard of hearing community, and parents of deaf or hard of hearing children. A message of choice, support, and respecting those who choose to communicate differently. A message about respect. Mocking those who choose to face adversity in a different way lack imagination. Reserve your judgement while you watch my 6 minute video. The video is subtitled. And there is no signing involved. I hope you enjoy my vlog.
Facebook "Deafhood? No thanks" membership soars!
The new Facebook "Deafhood? No thanks" group has rapidly grown over the last few weeks, especially over the last 7 days. People are delighted to see new members join this group. Yet some are calling this new group a controversal one. But it shouldn't be controversal at all when members simply go by the concept of respecting everybody no matter what a person's background or communication preferences. There is no need to surreptiously attack hearing parents for their decision to implant their deaf child. There is no need to surreptiously attack parents on their decision on how best to proceed with the educational and communication aspect for their deaf/hh child. Yet we see this happen on a daily basis.
My recent blog, "F*ck You, Deaf Community!" highlighted a discussion forum frequented by hearing parents of deaf/hh children. They voiced their frustrations and disgusts and recount stories of someone from the Deaf community who attacked them for their decisions on how to raise their deaf/hh child, or the fact their child has a cochlear implant. This isn't nowhere near what "deafhood" is supposed to be like but all about hate.
"Deafhood" leaders, as far as I can tell, never made the effort to condemn those people for their actions of hate. What I saw on Jamerica's video blog and how some of the leaders of "deafhood" responded to one fervent follower of "deafhood" simply begs the whole agenda and effort behind this so-called "deafhood" movement by leaders, including some of their close followers. I see more red flags than honest efforts to accept people for who and what they are, and mend fences along the way.
This Facebook group began on May 18, 2010 and as of today it has reached 297 members so far. It has averaged about 23 new members each day while on some days they have seen jumps of 50 or 60 new members in one day. These new members simply do not want anything to do with "deafhood" and with the current leaders of "deafhood." Many agree that the best approach would be a more neutral-positive approach than to attack, label, villify, and go after people who may simply disagree or have a different way of doing things. This "Deafhood? No thanks" Facebook group simply do not desire to be a part of such selfish acts and dishonesty.
My recent blog, "F*ck You, Deaf Community!" highlighted a discussion forum frequented by hearing parents of deaf/hh children. They voiced their frustrations and disgusts and recount stories of someone from the Deaf community who attacked them for their decisions on how to raise their deaf/hh child, or the fact their child has a cochlear implant. This isn't nowhere near what "deafhood" is supposed to be like but all about hate.
"Deafhood" leaders, as far as I can tell, never made the effort to condemn those people for their actions of hate. What I saw on Jamerica's video blog and how some of the leaders of "deafhood" responded to one fervent follower of "deafhood" simply begs the whole agenda and effort behind this so-called "deafhood" movement by leaders, including some of their close followers. I see more red flags than honest efforts to accept people for who and what they are, and mend fences along the way.
This Facebook group began on May 18, 2010 and as of today it has reached 297 members so far. It has averaged about 23 new members each day while on some days they have seen jumps of 50 or 60 new members in one day. These new members simply do not want anything to do with "deafhood" and with the current leaders of "deafhood." Many agree that the best approach would be a more neutral-positive approach than to attack, label, villify, and go after people who may simply disagree or have a different way of doing things. This "Deafhood? No thanks" Facebook group simply do not desire to be a part of such selfish acts and dishonesty.
Friday, May 28, 2010
Part II Mike's ASL Vlog to the Deaf Community
Yesterday I produced my first vlog, a video message to the Deaf community in ASL. It was also my first vlog for DVTV as well. Not a particular clean first vlog but at least I've gotten my first video message out to the Deaf community which is a start. Below is my 2nd part of my vlog. It's a better video and it's more prepared without the pauses. Below the video is a loose transcript of what I followed with some deviation but it captures mostly what I said.
Transcript:
Transcript:
This is part 2 of my vlog.
I didn't have time to finish up my thoughts. My first video. Need to stop fiddling with my face! Oh well.
Ok.
In my 2nd vlog I wanted to talk about technology.
I believe it is becoming a great communication equalizer for deaf and hard of hearing. And it's amazing how far we have come.
Remember technology was like 20 years ago? No internet! No cell phones. No smart phones that are connected to the internet. No video phone. NO internet like today. We had some email and discussion forums but that was about it.
NOw, what will communication technology be like 20 years from now? 3d real time communication in ASL? What about cell phones or smart phones that are connected to the internet? What will they be like 5, 10 or 20 years from now? Technology is moving so fast. On YouTube it now has automatic captioning. Although not perfect but it is a step in the right direction. Who would've thought two years ago that YouTube would come up with automatic captioning?
Yes. Technology is moving fast. I'm sure with videos we see on DVTV will soon become crystal clear and not so grainy. It's just a matter of time. What do you think of communication technology today? Has it helped your job? Your life? Anything? could you live without your today? Remember, you didn't have one 10 years ago and you lived fine without it! And, now, today, can't live without it. Strange how technology has helped us realize the importance of it for communication purposes.
What do you think?
So long.
Kokonut Pundit's ASL video message to deaf community
Here it is folks. My signed message to the deaf and hard of hearing community. Something to help dispel some myths, misconceptions and misunderstandings. Basically it's time to start with my signing and video-taping. I've been thinking about this for a few months now and I suppose there is no better time than now to bring out this video for you fans (and not so friendly fans) of Kokonut Pundit. I plan to do a 2nd video later on tonight since this first video I didn't have time to finish the rest of what I wanted to say and still have some thoughts left over. At any rate, here's my first video to help squelch some rumors and more.
Mike Sign Message to Deaf Community Part 1
Mike Sign Message to Deaf Community Part 1
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Deaf Weekly Explodes!

Here's a partial screen capture from Deaf Weekly May 26, 2010 newsletter highlighting its most-read story in the last issue. I did not expect to see my blog piece highlighted in the Deaf Weekly newsletter. I suppose it was the title that got people's attention. This was also the case in Deafread's Top 10 Blogs over the last 30 days where my blog generated alot of initial interest, curiousity, and perhaps certain assumptions what my blog title may have suggested. But this is not about the number of hits. This is about getting people's attention to the fact that the hearing community along with parents of deaf/hh children sometime do have a different perspective and feelings about the Deaf community. Especially among the few who may have a habit of making the Deaf community look bad. Something to ponder when it comes to people with different perspectives on life in general and the people they meet along the way.
Oh, before I go, take a look on the left side of my blog. You can see a picture of me with a YouTube logo that contains a link to my new Kokonut Pundit YouTube channel. Check it out if you're curious. Not much there yet but feel free to look around. It's still quite new.
UPDATE: Something to add here. Check out my first Kokonut Pundit's ASL video message to deaf community.
I hope you will enjoy my video. It's not much.
Very Special People Hate Crime
Well, isn't that special?
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
A response to DeafASLVlogs
I wrote a response to deafaslvlogs.wordpress.com under her blogpiece about me on May 24, 2010. It has been two days and my comment is still "Awaiting Moderation." I am putting down my response here just in case if this blogger doesn't allow my response to go through. She may be busy, sure. Or then again she could have other reasons or ulterior motives for not allowing my comment to show up on her blog. Although I've heard stories that she would refuse some people's responses to get posted on her blog. Not sure if that's wholly true or not. But just in case here is a copy of the screen grab. Below is what I wrote.
In my blogging, I have no interest in using my blog to make personal attacks against people in any of the deaf and hard of hearing communities. My disagreement is with "deafhood." And how it is used to pervert it's own ideology by mixing identity politics with Deaf culture in the attempt to get everybody to follow it. That will simply not work, especially when people use it as an agenda setting goal using intimidation tactics, guilt trips, or other perverted means of using hyperbole such as lecturing about "deaf hate crime" in the attempt to win sympathies and put "deafhood" up on a pedestal. Yet by doing so presents its own irony.
Of course when a crime is committed against a deaf person and the reason for the attack is because of the person's deafness then that is wrong. There are people who do act on their hate against people by physically attacking them because of their deafness, and that is totally wrong. And they should be prosecuted and jailed. Any kind of crime against a deaf person for the reason of his/her deafness should be met with some kind of a prosecution. But to disagree about "deafhood," or disagree with a Deaf person over a topic or for someone to not accept "deafhood" is NOT a "deaf hate crime." It doesn't even come close. It gets even more ridiculous whenever Deaf people accuse other deaf/hh people and call it a "crime" for having an opinion. Or call it a "Deaf hate speech." All in all, having a disagreement over an issue or topic is called having an opinion. It's not a crime. It's not about hate. It's about having an opinion. Be smart. Learn the difference.
This is not a so simple world with simple solutions. Each person is unique on how we deal with our hearing loss. Each parents' situation is unique when it comes to their deaf/hh child on communication access. Hearing loss is about people with all kinds of hearing loss from mild to profound. Each person has certain communications needs, wants and preferences. Some don't care for identity politics while others are immersed in them. Some preferred to be called hearing imparied, deaf, hard of hearing, Deaf or simply say "I have a hearing loss." If some are hoping that sensorineural hearing loss would be reversed in 10 or 20 years for now and would like to see their own hearing loss restored as well, good for them. Who am I to tell them they shouldn't do that? Who am I to tell parents they shouldn't do that for their deaf/hh baby? Who am I to tell parents that their communication options ought to be more restrictive or limited for their deaf/hh child? Who am I to tell people whether if they feel whole or partial?Will ASLDeafVlogs let my comment come through or not? The same question is asked of The Deaf Sherlock, will he allow my comments to come through as well? Are they busy or are they both purposely ignoring my comment? I hope it is not the latter. If so, then that would be a petty thing to do.
"Deafhood" as I see it is an ideology that mixes identity politics of its own brand, namely Deaf culture, rather than simply on a shared or common interest because mostly I see people that are constantly fixated on the "don't fix me" meme and connect that with "deafhood" and apply that to everybody else. No thanks.
The one single thing that is common in all of us is that we all have hearing loss from mild to profound. How our we deal with our hearing loss and communication barriers vary from one person to the next. So, that's the second common interest we all have. Everything else just de-evolve from there breaking up into various factions. Which is why I say, "Deafhood? No thanks." Accept that. Move on.
As for "deficient human beings," your analysis is wrong. I see potential in each and every human being regardless if a person is blind, deaf, partially paralyzed or has other certain limiting conditions but certainly does not limit their spirit and creativity. What I don't do is limit their choices. If one hopes that he or she will see
again or have improved vision with the help of medical technology, I wish him or
her luck. If one hopes that he or she will be able to hear fully once again, I wish him or her luck. If one hopes that a cure for spinal paralysis will happen soon on the horizon so that he or she can walk, I say good luck to that person and hope for the best. If a person chooses not to then I say, great, that is a personal choice. It is not my position to try and limit people dreams or hopes on their own journey, whatever that might be. It's not for me to say or define. Neither should you. It is not my position to limit parents' informed decision on how to raise their deaf/hh child. Rather I like to give them the opportunity to expand beyond what's possible by whatever means it would require to make for them see and experience positive success.
I hope that each of us succeed in our own ways that's positive and rewarding that each of us can only appreciate. Hopefully, others will appreciate it as well. Deaf identity politics is just ugly business. I have the right to define who I am, and not from you or anybody else have that right.
In my blogging, I have no interest in using my blog to make personal attacks against people in any of the deaf and hard of hearing communities. My disagreement is with "deafhood." And how it is used to pervert it's own ideology by mixing identity politics with Deaf culture in the attempt to get everybody to follow it. That will simply not work, especially when people use it as an agenda setting goal using intimidation tactics, guilt trips, or other perverted means of using hyperbole such as lecturing about "deaf hate crime" in the attempt to win sympathies and put "deafhood" up on a pedestal. Yet by doing so presents its own irony.
Of course when a crime is committed against a deaf person and the reason for the attack is because of the person's deafness then that is wrong. There are people who do act on their hate against people by physically attacking them because of their deafness, and that is totally wrong. And they should be prosecuted and jailed. Any kind of crime against a deaf person for the reason of his/her deafness should be met with some kind of a prosecution. But to disagree about "deafhood," or disagree with a Deaf person over a topic or for someone to not accept "deafhood" is NOT a "deaf hate crime." It doesn't even come close. It gets even more ridiculous whenever Deaf people accuse other deaf/hh people and call it a "crime" for having an opinion. Or call it a "Deaf hate speech." All in all, having a disagreement over an issue or topic is called having an opinion. It's not a crime. It's not about hate. It's about having an opinion. Be smart. Learn the difference.
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
A response to The Deaf Sherlock
Yesterday The Deaf Sherlock blogger made some comments about me and assumed some things about myself, my views, and what my opinions are regarding "deafhood." I'm not in the business to use my blog to personally attack people but to present my views, opinions, experiences, discoveries and life in general. Below is my response I left in The Deaf Sherlock's comment box yesterday which still hasn't been approved at this moment. Regardless of whether he approves it or not I'll put what I wrote in here in my blog. Note: Below I put in "Kokonut Pundit" and "The Deaf Sherlock" just to show who made the comment.
======================================
The Deaf Sherlock - "1st, get rid of your anger."
Kokonut Pundit - No anger whatsoever. There are certain things I disagree and even find silly. Do not mistake that for anger.
The Deaf Sherlock - "2nd, don't take it out on the deaf community."
Kokonut Pundit - Not taking it out on the deaf community. I have Deaf, deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing friends that either wear hearing aids, cochlear implants or none at all. Again, I do not "take it out on the deaf community." I have certain disagreements over certain issues. Please, understand the differences there.
The Deaf Sherlock - "Because the more you piss off your readers and followers, the more you will find out that nobody is going to read you ever again."
Kokonut Pundit - Many do share my opinions and understand where I'm coming from. I am not alone in this and that's readily obvious. Many also do misunderstand on what I'm writing about and thus have their own anger misplaced. People continue to read my blogs as I mix and match, whether its advocacy or playing the devil's advocate. For your sake and sanity it'd be best to take my blogs with a grain of salt instead.
The Deaf Sherlock - "3rd, apologize and do post it."
Kokonut Pundit - Apologize for what? For having an opinion?? My blog is not just for Deaf people but for Deaf, deaf, hard of hearing, hearing, CI users, late-deafened, hearing people, parents of deaf/hh kids, etc. What is there for me to apologize? Perhaps it is your anger that's misplaced here?
The Deaf Sherlock - "4th. get counseling."
Kokonut Pundit - Just because you do not like what I write (do you actually read carefully what I write and the points I'm making?). No one is forcing you to read my blog. You have a choice. Don't read it. Simple.
That's it in a nutshell. I hope that each and every blogger is able to attain their full potential in the quest for bloggerdom. We need people like you and everybody else to help disseminate ideas, suggestions, and points of views.
One suggestion though. Instead of complaining on your blog, how about asking questions in an email to me if you need clarifications. Perhaps with greater clarification you'd understand where I'm going with my blogs.
Lastly, I sincerely hope you post this as a show of maturity here.
Good day, sir.
=======================================
Will he post my response? And have an honest discussion?
We'll see.
I also made a response to DeafASLVlogs as well. But my comment is, too, "awaiting moderation." I've made a screen capture of that and will wait whether she will approve it or not and see if she has the maturity to allow my comment go through. If not, I will post what I wrote either later today or tomorrow and provide you a screen capture as proof.
======================================
The Deaf Sherlock - "1st, get rid of your anger."
Kokonut Pundit - No anger whatsoever. There are certain things I disagree and even find silly. Do not mistake that for anger.
The Deaf Sherlock - "2nd, don't take it out on the deaf community."
Kokonut Pundit - Not taking it out on the deaf community. I have Deaf, deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing friends that either wear hearing aids, cochlear implants or none at all. Again, I do not "take it out on the deaf community." I have certain disagreements over certain issues. Please, understand the differences there.
The Deaf Sherlock - "Because the more you piss off your readers and followers, the more you will find out that nobody is going to read you ever again."
Kokonut Pundit - Many do share my opinions and understand where I'm coming from. I am not alone in this and that's readily obvious. Many also do misunderstand on what I'm writing about and thus have their own anger misplaced. People continue to read my blogs as I mix and match, whether its advocacy or playing the devil's advocate. For your sake and sanity it'd be best to take my blogs with a grain of salt instead.
The Deaf Sherlock - "3rd, apologize and do post it."
Kokonut Pundit - Apologize for what? For having an opinion?? My blog is not just for Deaf people but for Deaf, deaf, hard of hearing, hearing, CI users, late-deafened, hearing people, parents of deaf/hh kids, etc. What is there for me to apologize? Perhaps it is your anger that's misplaced here?
The Deaf Sherlock - "4th. get counseling."
Kokonut Pundit - Just because you do not like what I write (do you actually read carefully what I write and the points I'm making?). No one is forcing you to read my blog. You have a choice. Don't read it. Simple.
That's it in a nutshell. I hope that each and every blogger is able to attain their full potential in the quest for bloggerdom. We need people like you and everybody else to help disseminate ideas, suggestions, and points of views.
One suggestion though. Instead of complaining on your blog, how about asking questions in an email to me if you need clarifications. Perhaps with greater clarification you'd understand where I'm going with my blogs.
Lastly, I sincerely hope you post this as a show of maturity here.
Good day, sir.
=======================================
Will he post my response? And have an honest discussion?
We'll see.
I also made a response to DeafASLVlogs as well. But my comment is, too, "awaiting moderation." I've made a screen capture of that and will wait whether she will approve it or not and see if she has the maturity to allow my comment go through. If not, I will post what I wrote either later today or tomorrow and provide you a screen capture as proof.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
Communication Technology - the ultimate aphrodisiac for Deaf, deaf and hard of hearing people
The one thing I can safely say that everybody can agree on is that communication technology is probably the ultimate aphrodiasic for Deaf, deaf and hard of hearing people. The kind of technology that gives us the ability to communicate with anyone, including hearing people. And vice versa, too. Gone would be the identity of who's exactly behind that cell phone you're talking with. Perhaps there would be no distinction on what cultural group a person would be identified with. No distiction whether if one is deaf or not simply because there is no communication barrier to begin? Would that be possible someday within our lifetime? With the way communication technology has been progressing I'd say very much so. And I think many of us deaf, Deaf, hard of hearing, CODA, parents of deaf/hh children, late deafened people and even the deaf and blind are certainly hopeful at this prospect. Meanwhile with the communication technology we have today, it has transformed many of us in how we continue to interact with the deaf, Deaf, deaf/blind and hearing communities. This will bound to improve over time. There's no doubt in that.We're not yet at the tipping point but technology is certainly paving the way on voice recognition to text such as YouTube, text to speech, and even ASL or sign language recognition to voice or text. I believe we'll see one technology wave after another over the next 10 to 20 years regarding communication access and improved interaction between people with hearing loss and hearing people. Things will be done much more automatically and without the need of a 3rd party to intervene if one chooses so.
We are slowly becoming a highly interactive and connected world. Communication barriers are slowly coming down in many areas. The tipping point for the deaf and hard of hearing community is yet to come but its coming. The day will come that no matter who you communicate with using your preferred mode of communication it will be understood by anyone, deaf or hearing. Don't believe that? Try and remember what it was like exactly 10 years ago and compare to what you have today. Imagine what it might be like 10 years from now. And with communication technology today, it has the ability to help preserve, enhance, and even promote Deaf culture such as ASL. Imagine that!
Ask this question yourself. How many communication technology companies do you know of that were run by deaf/hh people ten years ago? What about today? What do you think it'll be like 10 or 20 years from now? What kind of communication technology devices will you have on you that will enable you to communicate with others in face to face situations more readily and easily? What about wirelessly like smart phones? On demand remote captioning? On demand remote ASL interpreter? Communication devices that will enable deaf and blind become even more independent than ever before? And so on? Maybe a futuristic iPad that would enhance Deaf people communication experiences through it's own version of the video phone? The possibilities are endless when you have technology on your side.
This is a roller coaster ride and we've just begun. In twenty years from now you'll look back and say, "Wow! What a ride!" And what was that ride like since 1990, twenty years ago? That was the kiddie ride. Next, it's the quadruple loop with a 200 foot drop roller coaster ride. Hang on! And, oh, bring your vomit bag, too.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)