Commenting Rules in Kokonut Pundit

So far I've not approved some 3 or 4 comments in the past few weeks for a few reasons. One main reason is the personal attacks, and another is when a deaf commenter tries to imply or suggest one is practicing Nazism or eugenics. That I won't stand for. In the past I've had a link on commenting rules when people comment in my blog and I decided to put it up again in the comment page with a link to my standard rules. Why? It's simply because some people are unable to debate without making insinuations, personal attacks at other commenters, or try and divulge names of other anonymous bloggers. I'm not interested in ad hominem attacks or petty name calling. What I'm interested in is the general discussion and debating. Anybody can throw insults and bombs but not not everybody can debate or argue effectively. If you can only do the former then I suggest you not post your comments in here. Otherwise have a good day.

AB 2072 - passed

Great news. AB 2072 bill passed by the Health Senate Committee with a 5 to 1 vote, along with 2 abstaining. It now goes to the Senate which I'm sure they'll recognize this bill as a bill that empowers parents to make an informed decision.

This is about letting parents make the decision and not the government. No government or any other entity or agency will be doing the decision for parents. This is about empowering parents in making their own decision where an agency or government says, "Here you go, you decide." This exactly how it should be done rather than a government making the decision for parents of newborns diagnosed with hearing loss. The best way to lose your independence is when a government ends up making decisions for you. This would be an example of interfering into people lives rather than helping them make their own decisions for a change provided that they are given adequate and proper information so they can make an informed decision. Once a government starts to make decisions for parents of newborns diagnosed with hearing loss would be the day when the government practices communism.

However, this bill would force audiologists to provide information given to them on ALL communication options, including ASL. If there are biased audiologists out there who do not favor ASL they would soon be forced to provide parents the various communication methods and shall include ASL. The audiologists do not decide for the parents. The government does not decide for the parents. State, regional or local agencies do not decide for the parents. Advocacy groups do not get to decide for the parents of newborns diagnosed with hearing loss such as CAD, CENIAS, NAD, DBC, NORCAL, DCARA, Deafhood Yoga, and any other organizations. The sole decision makers are the parents. This is what the Senate will recognize and understand.

AG Bell on AB2072

The AB 2072 bill is about choices, obviously. It discusses that parents of newborns with hearing loss get information that covers,

American Sign Language(ASL), Total Communication, Cued Speech, and Listening and Spoken Language communication options for children with hearing loss, including, but not limited to, information about deaf and hard-of-hearing organizations, agencies and early intervention centers, and educational programs.

The problem is that those who oppose this bill often spend more time going after AGBell and other similar organizations rather than to focus and promote ASL itself. AGBell has a position paper written up some 5 years ago on their position on ASL.

AG Bell acknowledges that a chosen approach depends on culture, family interests, and desired communication outcome. AG Bell believes that the language and communication approach chosen should be based on an informed decision made by the child’s parents/family and based on their own unique circumstances.

With respect to American Sign Language (ASL), AG Bell acknowledges ASL as a language in and of itself. AG Bell also recognizes ASL’s importance in Deaf culture as a unique feature, and a language that many take pride in learning. AG Bell does not believe that ASL should be prohibited or restricted as a choice, nor does AG Bell advocate against learning ASL as part of a child’s overall development if that is what the child’s parents desire.

Regardless of chosen language or communication approach, AG Bell believes that families should have early access to professionals with specialized education and training in the desired language or communication method."

Again, it's about parental choice but parents need to be informed of all communication options, including ASL, the educational choices and the many services and advocacy groups on hearing loss that are available to the parents. AGBell believes in choices and believes that the AB2072 bill is about that in a letter to Tony Mendoza.

AG Bell believes that the language and communication approach chosen should be based on an informed decision made by the child's parents/family and based on their own unique circumstances. Regardless of chosen language or communication approach, families should have early access to professionals with specialized education and training in the desired language or communication outcome.

AG Bell believes it is important that organizations that advocate for or work with individuals with hearing loss work together to broaden health care providers' understanding of all communication methods so that upon identification, unbaised information about all options can be made available to parents and their children.

Senator Elaine K. Alquist who is the chair in the Senate Health Committee wrote up an analysis (on June 9, 2010) on the AB2072 bill, deafness, the issues involved, and about the deaf culture and community. This analysis has a firm grasp of everything. Senator Elaine K. Alquist makes a conclusion and recommendation to the committee (note the bolded portion):

Both supporters and opposition to this bill agree that any information provided to parents of deaf children should be unbiased, based on scientific facts, and come from a reliable, neutral third-party source. To address this, the committee suggests amendments to require that either DDS or CDE develop or approve the use of standardized, objective pamphlet of information about communication options for children who are deaf or hard-of-hearing, that is sufficient to allow the child's parents to make an informed decision. This information shall be decided upon by the department in conjunction with a stakeholder panel, comprised of representatives of the various communication options. The cost for developing the pamphlet and conducting the stakeholder panel shall be covered through the development of an additional state fund to accept private donations for this purpose. The provisions of the bill shall only be made operative after sufficient funds have been collected to cover necessary expenses.

Both parties agree that information ought to be in an unbiased format and that stakeholders in each of the communication option shall be a part of helping the development of this pamphlet for parents of newborn babies diagnosed with a hearing loss.

No conspiracy theories.

No AGBell boogie monster under the bed.

No Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies in the attempt to label this bill and Tony Mendoza.

And none of the eugenics stuff that Edwin Black erroneously tried to infer about the Deaf community and culture's own future.

Just a straight up bill that is designed to help parents make an informed decision regarding their child diagnosed with a hearing loss.

If you disagree, disagree on the merit of the argument itself and not about trying to concoct some "end of the world" scenario here. The bill does include ASL as one of the many communication options whether used alone or in conjunction with other options. So, that is an important step. The ASL community will still have a stake in this once this bill is signed by the governor which, ironically so, at one time played a deaf and mute hit-man for a mob in a 1973 movie "The Long Goodbye."

When anti-AB2072 group uses Nazi labels

A new article in The Cutting Edge came out late yesterday about California's AB-2072 bill where it laboriously use Nazi examples and labels about that bill. This bill is about allowing parents of newborns diagnosed with hearing loss be given information on communication and educational options where it does include ASL as one clear option. It's a resource that will allow parents make an informed decision after doing their research and who to contact. When people use Nazi examples or references inappropiately as an argument it's called Godwin's Law or Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies. Drenching it with words like "eugenics" and "Nazi-style" elimination won't win the argument. Especially when you throw in conspiracy theories and accusations against other organizations. It'll simply marginalize certain Deaf groups even further onto the fringe by those who opposed AB-2072 bill whenever Nazi references are used. This bill gives parents the necessary resource and power to make an informed decision and by no one else.
I think this is a good bill. It's an opportunity to capitalize ASL even further once passed.

The Mysterious Disappearance of "Deaf Dynamic Duo!"

My reaction to last week's "Deaf Dynamic Duo's"suggestive responses to my earlier vlog where I praised their creativity but their videos have mysteriously vanished after only barely week! Why? Even the YouTube "DDD" channel disappeared as well and started to rack up subscribers, too! The video by Barb Digi and Dawn Schriver was an amusing video. But I'm disappointed. Why has the DDD team disappeared? What happened to the last of the DDD's funny video "Holy Tank Tops!" ?

Addendum: I removed the videos since it'd be pointless to have my video up if the DDD's video isn't up to see what the joke is all about.

Sorry folks.

A poll: Do you approve AB2072 bill?

Here's a poll on California's AB2072 bill. Below is a video about what AB 2072 is about.






Warning: This poll is not a scientific poll.

Vinton Cerf accepted award from AGBell !

Vinton Cerf as some of you may know is the "Father of the Internet." He is also deaf. But here is probably a little known fact among those in the Deaf community. Vinton Cerf was awarded the Alexander Graham Bell Medal for his contribution on the internet. AGBell recognized Vinton Cerf's extra-ordinary contribution in helping build the first ever internet. The real surprise is that this medal award took place 13 years ago. Maybe it's time that the Deaf community demand that Vinton Cerf return his AGBell medal back to AGBell? And if Vinton Cerf refuses to return his medal back to AGBell then perhaps the Deaf community ought to stage a boycott against using the internet as a show of solidiarity hoping that Vinton Cerf will cave into their demands?

Yeah, I bet you wouldn't.

(correction: changed "Vincent" to "Vinton" which is his correct first name).

Sock! Pow! It's the Deaf Dynamic Duo!!

"Holy Kleenex Batman! It was right under our nose and we blew it!" - an actual Robin quote in a Batman show in 1966. Yeah, you heard it right. Here's the new Deaf Dynamic Duo who just now set up a YouTube site to use their mocking superpowers on unsuspecting riff raffs. PoW! BiFF! WhaMMo! Holy tank top, Batman! It's Kokonut Pundit!

These two Deaf ladies obviously saw my vlog a few days ago on "audism," "deafhood," and "deaf hate crime." They decided to do a mocking vlog on me yet I'm honored at the same time that they even took the time and effort to do this. Also, kudos to them on their creativity! I decided to promote their video here on my Kokonut Pundit blog! And a special surprise, too. This blog is my 1,500th blog! Big thanks to the two ladies for helping me make my 1,500th blog piece!

ADDENDUM: My video removed since it refers to DDD's video below which is no longer available.

I'm honored! Thank you ladies for watching my vlog!

Now, folks, watch the Deaf Dynamic Duo in action! Holy Kleenix, Batman! Warning: it is not subtitled.

DDD's VIDEO REMOVED - not working.

UPDATE: As you may have noticed the "Dynamic Duo's" video is no longer available. It was deleted. Interesting. And I wonder why? Also, more of their videos are no longer public but made private. I wonder why? Are they insecure about showing their videos to the general public and make them fully accessible to watch? Why the sudden deletion, ladies?

A Critical Analysis

Self explanatory.





My Response:



Insert pinky finger to lips.......

Jumping the "deaf hate crime" bandwagon

My video look at "deaf hate crime." Is it over-rated? Abused? Used as a weapon of choice? Or is this really nothing new under the sun?

When a deaf person is mocked for his voice...by another deaf person

Imagine a deaf person mocking or making fun of another deaf person's use of his/her own voice. Well, it does happen. It's even worse when someone goes after a deaf father and his deaf son who wears a cochlear implant. And I have a video response for that based on a recent YouTube incident between Russell Errigo and ASL1817.

Here's my video seen below.

In the beginning I sign, and then I switch over to voice just to make a point, and then in the end I resume signing. This was brought up when ASL1817 used the opportunity to slam Russell Errigo about his speaking ability even though he didn't ask ASL1817's opinion for it. It was all centered around a topic about Russell's son, Dominic, and his ability to speak and listen with the use of his cochlear implant. A success if anything else. It's a double edged sword when you happen to be the deaf parents of a deaf child in a Deaf community even though the parents know ASL but gets their child implanted with cochlear implant at age 2. This is all about early intervention. Something that, apparently so, Russell and his wife knew about early on. You can find the video of Russell's son and the comments that came with it in YouTube.

Here's my response to ASL1817's attempt to slam Russell in more ways than one.

Famous deaf talk show radio personality gets married.

Well, Rush Limbaugh finally got married, again. The marriage ceremony took place in Florida where the cochlear implant wearing Rush Limbaugh took his vows with 33 year old Kathryn Rogers. Rush shelled out a cool $1 million dollars to pay for Elton John's service to sing at his wedding. Something I'm sure that Elton John will get some grief for later on.

Tenth anniversary for "Association of Adult Musicians with Hearing Loss"

The Association of Adult Musicians with Hearing Loss group will be celebrating their 10th anniversary on June 8, 2010. These are deaf and hard of hearing musicians who have a love for playing their musical instruments and their music. Over the years it has grown painfully slow until the last few years we have seen more new members join than the last 8 years. Currently there are 156 members that play all kinds of musical instruments from the flute, piano, guitar, banjo to singing with their voice. This is a mixed group of those born with hearing loss to those who lost their hearing later in life who either wear hearing aids, cochlear implants or none at all. The two things that we all have in common is hearing loss and a passion to play our musical instrument. Having a hearing loss does stop these people from enjoying their musical instruments.

If you want to join and be part of this group that discusses anything from hearing loss issues to video recitals to web chats to discussing the history of music, you'll have to start by going here to begin the membership process. And join the growing ranks of adult musicians with hearing loss.

Money donated to "Deafhood? No thanks" Facebook group

In a surprise move that came out of the blue a somewhat mysterious donor is in the process of donating $656 to a newly established Facebook group called "Deafhood? No thanks." It was explained that the money to be donated is contingent on seeing membership hit 400 members, which could happen sometime today. This somewhat large sum of money came as an unexpected surprise never thinking this sort of thing would ever happen. Of course, by the time you're done reading this you might be kicking yourself.

Adversity - a perspective from a deaf/hh person.

Here's my video blog discussing "adversity" and what it means to me. A chance for the Deaf community to see my side of my communication preference. This video is also a message of support to deaf and hard of hearing people, everybody. And a message of hope to parents of deaf/hh children as well that in life, anything is possible.



Transcript for the signing part:

What is adversity?

It is not the same thing as overcoming oppression. It's about overcoming obstacles in life successfully. Here I produced a video blog about 3 years ago in the desert landscape of New Mexico to discuss adversity. My vlog was a message of support to the deaf and hard of hearing community, and parents of deaf or hard of hearing children. A message of choice, support, and respecting those who choose to communicate differently. A message about respect. Mocking those who choose to face adversity in a different way lack imagination. Reserve your judgement while you watch my 6 minute video. The video is subtitled. And there is no signing involved. I hope you enjoy my vlog.

Facebook "Deafhood? No thanks" membership soars!

The new Facebook "Deafhood? No thanks" group has rapidly grown over the last few weeks, especially over the last 7 days. People are delighted to see new members join this group. Yet some are calling this new group a controversal one. But it shouldn't be controversal at all when members simply go by the concept of respecting everybody no matter what a person's background or communication preferences. There is no need to surreptiously attack hearing parents for their decision to implant their deaf child. There is no need to surreptiously attack parents on their decision on how best to proceed with the educational and communication aspect for their deaf/hh child. Yet we see this happen on a daily basis.

My recent blog, "F*ck You, Deaf Community!" highlighted a discussion forum frequented by hearing parents of deaf/hh children. They voiced their frustrations and disgusts and recount stories of someone from the Deaf community who attacked them for their decisions on how to raise their deaf/hh child, or the fact their child has a cochlear implant. This isn't nowhere near what "deafhood" is supposed to be like but all about hate.

"Deafhood" leaders, as far as I can tell, never made the effort to condemn those people for their actions of hate. What I saw on Jamerica's video blog and how some of the leaders of "deafhood" responded to one fervent follower of "deafhood" simply begs the whole agenda and effort behind this so-called "deafhood" movement by leaders, including some of their close followers. I see more red flags than honest efforts to accept people for who and what they are, and mend fences along the way.


This Facebook group began on May 18, 2010 and as of today it has reached 297 members so far. It has averaged about 23 new members each day while on some days they have seen jumps of 50 or 60 new members in one day. These new members simply do not want anything to do with "deafhood" and with the current leaders of "deafhood." Many agree that the best approach would be a more neutral-positive approach than to attack, label, villify, and go after people who may simply disagree or have a different way of doing things. This "Deafhood? No thanks" Facebook group simply do not desire to be a part of such selfish acts and dishonesty.

Part II Mike's ASL Vlog to the Deaf Community

Yesterday I produced my first vlog, a video message to the Deaf community in ASL. It was also my first vlog for DVTV as well. Not a particular clean first vlog but at least I've gotten my first video message out to the Deaf community which is a start. Below is my 2nd part of my vlog. It's a better video and it's more prepared without the pauses. Below the video is a loose transcript of what I followed with some deviation but it captures mostly what I said.



Transcript:

This is part 2 of my vlog.

I didn't have time to finish up my thoughts. My first video. Need to stop fiddling with my face! Oh well.

Ok.

In my 2nd vlog I wanted to talk about technology.

I believe it is becoming a great communication equalizer for deaf and hard of hearing. And it's amazing how far we have come.

Remember technology was like 20 years ago? No internet! No cell phones. No smart phones that are connected to the internet. No video phone. NO internet like today. We had some email and discussion forums but that was about it.

NOw, what will communication technology be like 20 years from now? 3d real time communication in ASL? What about cell phones or smart phones that are connected to the internet? What will they be like 5, 10 or 20 years from now? Technology is moving so fast. On YouTube it now has automatic captioning. Although not perfect but it is a step in the right direction. Who would've thought two years ago that YouTube would come up with automatic captioning?

Yes. Technology is moving fast. I'm sure with videos we see on DVTV will soon become crystal clear and not so grainy. It's just a matter of time. What do you think of communication technology today? Has it helped your job? Your life? Anything? could you live without your today? Remember, you didn't have one 10 years ago and you lived fine without it! And, now, today, can't live without it. Strange how technology has helped us realize the importance of it for communication purposes.

What do you think?

So long.

Kokonut Pundit's ASL video message to deaf community

Here it is folks. My signed message to the deaf and hard of hearing community. Something to help dispel some myths, misconceptions and misunderstandings. Basically it's time to start with my signing and video-taping. I've been thinking about this for a few months now and I suppose there is no better time than now to bring out this video for you fans (and not so friendly fans) of Kokonut Pundit. I plan to do a 2nd video later on tonight since this first video I didn't have time to finish the rest of what I wanted to say and still have some thoughts left over. At any rate, here's my first video to help squelch some rumors and more.

Mike Sign Message to Deaf Community Part 1

Deaf Weekly Explodes!

Here's a partial screen capture from Deaf Weekly May 26, 2010 newsletter highlighting its most-read story in the last issue. I did not expect to see my blog piece highlighted in the Deaf Weekly newsletter. I suppose it was the title that got people's attention. This was also the case in Deafread's Top 10 Blogs over the last 30 days where my blog generated alot of initial interest, curiousity, and perhaps certain assumptions what my blog title may have suggested. But this is not about the number of hits. This is about getting people's attention to the fact that the hearing community along with parents of deaf/hh children sometime do have a different perspective and feelings about the Deaf community. Especially among the few who may have a habit of making the Deaf community look bad. Something to ponder when it comes to people with different perspectives on life in general and the people they meet along the way.

Oh, before I go, take a look on the left side of my blog. You can see a picture of me with a YouTube logo that contains a link to my new Kokonut Pundit YouTube channel. Check it out if you're curious. Not much there yet but feel free to look around. It's still quite new.

UPDATE: Something to add here. Check out my first Kokonut Pundit's ASL video message to deaf community.

I hope you will enjoy my video. It's not much.

Very Special People Hate Crime

This whole hate crime thing is getting a bit out of hand here. Some are trying to make some money off it and get recognition for it by twisting certain words that do not reflect reality accurately. What's more, people are now tacking qualifiers to the words "hate crime" just because they think they really are "special people" and that they deserve the world's sympathy. What's even worse is for obnoxious people to attack other people by calling their opinions or disagreements as a "hate speech" and even go so far as to call it as a "hate crime." Very special people they are indeed. Amazingly tone deaf to this whole thing when it is just a simple opinion and nothing more. No crime was committed. Yet some people have the uncanny ability to take someone's strong but valid opinion and immediately call it a "hate crime." They go about assuming things about a perons's opinion but won't contact the person to ask for clarifications first, which would've saved a lot of headaches in the first place instead of getting all huffy about it. But calling a bunch of truly special people as "retards" or "tards" is not a nice thing to say, either. It is not their fault if they are placed in a special school so they can learn how to become independent. I'm sure these very special people still deserve some modicum of respect from each of us. Yet, I have been accused on a few ocassions when other special people called my blogs or opinions as a "hate speech." But my blogs were never about hate but making a point based on my perspective and experience. Sometimes the ball drops even further when the truly special people come out of the woodwork and call my opinions or comments as a "hate crime." Boggles the mind.

Well, isn't that special?